00193463-01 - 第96页

2 Operational Safety User Manual S IPLACE S-25 H M 2.6 Lock o ut and tag out procedure Software Vers ion SR.503.xx 04/2002 US Edition 96 6. T o evaluate the lo ck/tag out pr ocedure , the safety department will con duct …

User Manual SIPLACE S-25 HM 2 Operational Safety

Software Version SR.503.xx 04/2002 US Edition 2.6 Lock out and tag out procedure

2.6.4 Responsibilities

1. It shall be the responsibility of the maintenance and electrical personnel to make sure this pro-

cedure is adhered to.

2. It shall be the responsibility of the maintenance and electrical personnel’s immediate

supervisor to instruct his personnel on this procedure.

3. It shall be the responsibility of the Safety Officer with assistance from the Safety Committee,

Health Service Department, and the various managers and Vice-Presidents to administer the

Lock Out / Tag Out Procedure.

2.6.5 Training

1. Employee training

The safety regulations require training for every individual, of course every employee is not ex-

posed to the same degree of danger or is involved with LO/TO as others are. So extensive

training is not necessary for everyone. 2

2. To determine how much training to provide for each worker, the employees are divided into

three groups. Each group has its own level of training.

3. Authorized employees

These workers actually install the locks and tags and do the maintenance or service work. So

they must know the most about controlled energy. First, they must be able to recognize all

energy sources and measure the amount of energy. Authorized employees must look for en-

ergy sources out of the realm of the obvious. These energy sources include electrical, mechan-

ical, hydraulic, pneumatic, chemical, thermal and gravitational. Once these workers can

recognize all energy sources they must be taught how to isolate, control, and release the en-

ergy without any risk. 2

4. Affected employees

These are workers who operate the machinery or equipment that may be de-energized. Other

employees who may be affected include those who work in an area that contain equipment that

may be locked/tagged out. These employees have to be instructed about the nature of the en-

ergy control program, they must know why lock/tag out is important, what tags and locks look

like and why they must not remove tags or locks. 2

5. All others

As the name implies, any employee who is not affected or authorized fits into this category.

There employees include office personal, engineers, managers, and upper management. Al-

though they do not have a direct relationship to the machinery being locked or tagged, they

have to receive some training. 2

2 Operational Safety User Manual SIPLACE S-25 HM

2.6 Lock out and tag out procedure Software Version SR.503.xx 04/2002 US Edition

6. To evaluate the lock/tag out procedure, the safety department will conduct periodic inspec-

tions. As part of the inspection the safety department will document that all facets of the pro-

cedure are followed. The safety department will follow up with formal classroom review or re-

training of the LO/TO procedure.

2.6.6 Review

This procedure will be reviewed and amended as required but in no case less frequently than once

a year. 2

User Manual SIPLACE S-25 HM 2 Operational Safety

Software Version SR.503.xx 04/2002 US Edition 2.7 Emissions and energy efficiency of the touchscreen monitor

2.7 Emissions and energy efficiency of the touch-

screen monitor

2.7.1 X-ray radiation

The X-ray radiation generated in the monitor is adequately shielded by the intrinsically safe cath-

ode-ray tube. The local emissions are less than 1

µS/h (micro-Sievert per hour). The accelerating

voltage is limited by the device to a maximum of 26 kV. 2

The monitor conforms to the German Directive for protection against harmful X-ray radiation. The

X-ray emissions from the monitor conformed to the DHHS Rules 21 CFR, subsection J on the date

of manufacture and to the FCC Rules, part 15. 2

2.7.2 Efficiency and electromagnetic emissions

The monitor fulfils the conditions for efficiency (to ISO 9241-3) and safety (to EN 60950). 2

The low-frequency electromagnetic emissions fall below the MPR II guidelines issued by the

Swedish Radiation Institute in Stockholm. 2