semi合集-English.pdf - 第600页
SEMI E83-1000 © SEMI 1999 , 2000 2 Table 1 Dimension al Requirements Symbol Value, mm ( in.) Tolerance (mm) Type a11 0 deg. +/- 0. 25 deg. angle ∅ d11 15.0 (. 591) +/- 0.2 diameter d12 33.0 (1.299) +/- 0.2 distance d13 3…

SEMI E83-1000 © SEMI 1999, 20001
SEMI E83-1000
SPECIFICATION FOR 300 mm PGV MECHANICAL DOCKING FLANGE
This Provisional Specification was technically approved by the Global Physical Interfaces & Carriers
Committee and is the direct responsibility of the North American Physical Interfaces & Carriers Committee.
Current edition approved by the North American Regional Standards Committee on July 14, 2000. Initially
available at www.semi.org August 2000; to be published October 2000. Originally published June 1999.
1 Purpose
1.1 This specification is intended to promote
consistent interface features between Person Guided
Vehicles and SEMI E15.1 equipment.
2 Scope
2.1 This specification defines a mechanical standard
for the stationary (equipment) side of the docking
flange used by 300 mm Person Guided Vehicles
(PGVs). This flange is to be mounted to the floor within
the volume defined by SEMI E64 at SEMI E15.1 and
SEMI E64 compliant equipment.
2.2 This standard does not purport to address safety
issues, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the users of this standard to establish
appropriate safety and health practices and determine
the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
3 Limitations
3.1 This standard does not define the PGV (active)
side of the docking interface or carrier transfer. The
PGV and the PGV side of the docking interface designs
should comprehend the physical limitations of
equipment to which they are being applied.
4 Referenced Standards
4.1 SEMI Standards
SEMI E15 — Specification for Tool Load Port
SEMI E15.1 — Provisional Specification for 300 mm
Tool Load Port
SEMI E64 — Provisional Specification for 300mm
Cart to SEMI E15.1 Docking Interface Port
5 Terminology
5.1 Acronyms and Abbreviations
5.1.1 PGV — Person Guided Vehicle (cart)
5.2 Definitions
5.2.1 carrier — Any cassette, box, pod, or boat that
contains wafers (per SEMI E15).
5.2.2 cart — A floor based carrier transfer vehicle (per
SEMI E64).
5.2.3 docking — The act of locating a floor-based
carrier transport vehicle for carrier transfer to/from
equipment (per SEMI E64).
5.2.4 facial datum plane — A vertical plane that
bisects the wafers and that is parallel to the front side of
the carrier (where wafers are removed or inserted). On
tool load ports, it is also parallel to the load face plane
specified in SEMI E15 on the side of the tool where the
carrier is loaded and unloaded (per SEMI E57).
5.2.5 load face plane — The furthest physical vertical
boundary plane from carrier centroid on the side(s) of
the equipment where loading of the tool is intended (per
SEMI E15).
5.2.6 load port — The interface location on a tool
where carriers are placed to allow the tool to process
wafers (per SEMI E15).
5.2.7 transfer — To either load or unload (per SEMI
E15).
6 Requirements
6.1 The dimensions that define the universal docking
flange are listed in Table 1 and shown on Figure 1.
6.1.1 The minimum length of the docking flange is
defined by 2×w11. This minimum length is intended to
fit under the shadow of the smallest possible width
SEMI E15.1 compatible load port. The PGV and PGV
docking must provide full functionality given a
minimum length docking flange. No maximum length
has been specified.
6.1.2 One vertical pin (labeled VP in Figure 2) is
intended to be used for horizontal registration of the
PGV to the docking flange. This pin is also intended as
a feature for an active mechanism on the PGV to lock
on to.
6.2 There are three surfaces on the flange and a verti-
cal pin that can be used as the initial docking contacts
point(s) with the PGV. These have been identified as
surfaces A, B and C and pin VP as shown in Figure 2.
These features are the primary load bearing features
during the act of docking, no other features or surfaces
shall be used as initial docking contact points.

SEMI E83-1000 © SEMI 1999, 2000 2
Table 1 Dimensional Requirements
Symbol Value, mm (in.) Tolerance (mm) Type
a11 0 deg. +/- 0.25 deg. angle
∅d11
15.0 (.591) +/- 0.2 diameter
d12 33.0 (1.299) +/- 0.2 distance
d13 39.0 (1.535) +/- 0.2 distance
d14 62.0 (2.441) +/- 0.2 distance
d15 80.0 (3.150) +/- 0.2 distance
d16 237.5 (9.350) +/- 2.5 distance
d17 68.0 (2.677) minimum distance
h11 24.0 (.945) +/- 0.2 distance
h12 39.0 (1.535) +/- 0.2 distance
h13 40.0 (1.575) +/-0.2 distance
h14 83.0 (3.268) +/-0.2 distance
h15 20.0 (.787) maximum distance
r11 2.0 (.079) +/-0.2 radius
r13 4.0 (.157) +/-0.2 radius
r14 5.0 (.197) +/-0.2 radius
w11 200 (7.874) minimum distance
Figure 1
Side Elevation View I
6.3 The flange must be installed such that the vertical
pin (VP) is capable of being aligned with the load port
bilateral datum plane (as defined in SEMI E15.1) and
surface A is a distance of d16 from the load port facial
datum plane (as defined in SEMI E15.1). The angle of
incidence between surface A and the facial datum plane
should be capable of adjustment to a11 listed in Table
1.
6.3.1 The docking flange is to be physically isolated
from the equipment and should be mounted such that
the equipment and equipment load port are protected
from the impact incurred during docking.
Figure 2
Side Elevation View II
6.4 When the flange is removed, no mounting
hardware shall remain protruding from the floor.
6.5 Surfaces A, B, B’ and C shown on Figure 2 must
exist per tolerances listed in Table 1.
Figure 3
Front Elevation View
NOTICE:. SEMI makes no warranties or
representations as to the suitability of the standards set
forth herein for any particular application. The
determination of the suitability of the standard is solely
the responsibility of the user. Users are cautioned to
refer to manufacturer’s instructions, product labels,
product data sheets, and other relevant literature
respecting any materials mentioned herein. These
standards are subject to change without notice.
The user’s attention is called to the possibility that
compliance with this standard may require use of
copyrighted material or of an invention covered by
patent rights. By publication of this standard, SEMI
takes no position respecting the validity of any patent
rights or copyrights asserted in connection with any
item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard
are expressly advised that determination of any such
patent rights or copyrights, and the risk of infringement
of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.

SEMI E83-1000 © SEMI 1999, 20003
RELATED INFORMATION 1
APPLICATION NOTES
NOTE: This related information is not an official part of SEMI E83, but was approved for publication by full letter ballot
procedures on July 14, 2000.
R1-1 The intent of this standard is to provide manually
guided 300mm carrier transport PGVs a standard flange
for docking and to facilitate a safe, quick, and
repeatable PGV to load port carrier transfer method or
mechanism. Standardization of features on the flange is
intended to allow for interoperability between PGV
designs and the docking flange.
R1-2 SEMI E64 defines Zone L as an exclusion zone
in SEMI E15.1 compliant tools. It is intended that the
docking flange be mounted in this zone.
R1-3 The docking interface flange includes features to
allow for the following minimum functionality of the
PGV to flange docking procedure:
• Stopping PGV motion
• Guidance of PGV to flange
• x, y & theta alignment of the PGV to the flange
• Locking of PGV to flange
• Docking parallel or perpendicular to the flange
R1-4 The PGV side of the interface may include
additional features to allow for all or some of the
following functionality:
• Compliance to the docking flange
• To dampen impact of docking forces
R1-5 No features on the standard docking flange
provide an adjustable feature to indicate the height
(dimension as H defined by SEMI E15.1) the load port
horizontal datum plane has been adjusted to.
R1-6 It is likely that the alignment error and tolerance
stack up between the docking interface flange and the
equipment load port will not provide sufficient
accuracy alone for accurate pick/placement of a pod
onto the kinematic couplings on the load port.
R1-7 Possible sources of alignment error are:
• Cleanroom floor height and level
• PGV wheels and framework
• Installation accuracy of docking interface flange
• Stability of mounting
R1-8 It may be necessary to use additional alignment
methods to improve accuracy of pod placement onto the
kinematic couplings.
R1-9 It is expected that the interface device be floor
mounted. Thus, the equipment must not require the use
of support pedestals or other support structures under
the floor below Zone L.
R1-10 The docking flange should sustain docking
impact for the lifetime of the flange without any
performance degradation.
• Assume 90kg (200lb) PGV moving at 0.3m/s
(1ft/sec)
• Assume 250,000 docking cycles within a flange
lifetime
• Recommended to design for 3x safety factor for
single docking cycle
R1-11 Flange must be quick remove, replace, align and
calibrate.
R1-12 Surface B' (shown on Figure 2) allows docking
mechanism designs to grab onto the docking flange
without using the docking pin for support.
R1-13 The method of attaching the vertical pin to the
flange is not defined in this standard. Docking flange
designers should be aware of the docking forces
incurred on this pin and design the attachment method
accordingly.
R1-14 The method of attaching the flange to the floor
is not defined in this standard. Docking flange
designers should be aware of the docking forces
incurred on the flange and/or pin and design the
attachment method accordingly.
R1-15 This standard specifies the radii of certain edges
found on the docking flange. It is recommended that
edges that do not have a specified radius are radiused or
broken to eliminate sharp edges.
R1-16 It is left to user to define the needed flange
length (w2×2) at the time of placing an order.
NOTICE:. SEMI makes no warranties or
representations as to the suitability of the standards set
forth herein for any particular application. The
determination of the suitability of the standard is solely
the responsibility of the user. Users are cautioned to
refer to manufacturer’s instructions, product labels,
product data sheets, and other relevant literature