Test_Flow_for_Advanced_Packages_WhitePaper_1115.pdf - 第3页

ADV ANCED P ACKAGE TEST FLOW 3 Abstract With the newest integrated circuit (IC) packages, th e old adage of “faster, cheaper and better” (FCB) gets an additional adjective - “slimmer.” This generates the n ew term “faste…

ADVANCED PACKAGE TEST FLOW 2

Table of Contents

Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 3

Test Flow for Advanced Packages (2.5D/SLIM/3D) ................................................................ 4

Improving Interposer Yield using Redundancy - Eliminating the Need to Test ....................... 5

Test Challenges with Advanced Packaging Technologies ........................................................ 6

Adapting Existing Equipment for Advanced Package Test ...................................................... 7

Universal Test Flow for Advanced Packages ............................................................................ 9

Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 10

References ............................................................................................................................... 11

ADVANCED PACKAGE TEST FLOW 3

Abstract

With the newest integrated circuit (IC) packages, the old adage of “faster, cheaper and better” (FCB)

gets an additional adjective - “slimmer.” This generates the new term “faster, cheaper, better &

slimmer” (FCBS) that should become a new industry buzzword. With FCB, it was a generally

accepted principle that one could get “two out of the three.” However, with the FCBS concept, it is

understood that the combined product will exhibit all four characteristics with combined benefits

that outweigh the sum of the individual components.

Product designers cognizant of the FCBS requirements are pushing outsourced assembly and

test (OSAT) companies to deliver integrated modules (chips) that do more, with a thinner form

factor. This includes integrating devices into a package, creating a System in Package (SiP), which

combines devices from different technology nodes. Such integration has been made possible by the

use of advanced substrates that provide fine line and space, or with the use of silicon interposers that

use Through Silicon Via (TSV) technology. Alternatively, product integrators can use Amkor’s most

advanced packaging solution, Silicon-Less Integrated Module (SLIM™) technology that eliminates

TSVs, further reducing package height. Die stacking technologies including 3D and package

stacking approaches such as Package-on-Package (PoP) are also employed to deliver FCBS

products.

One important aspect of achieving an FCBS product is reducing scrap cost. This is achieved

by an interactive test flow, wherein the device (system/ sub-system) being built is tested as

individual components as well as tested during the assembly process. Testing partially assembled

devices poses new challenges and risks, such as handling thinned dies and exposed pads. This paper

examines the various test insert points and proposes a suitable test flow for products that use

advanced packaging technologies.

ADVANCED PACKAGE TEST FLOW 4

Test Flow for Advanced Packages (2.5D/SLIM/3D)

The process of building a “chip” can be viewed as a fan-out process, where the die is

attached to a substrate or interposer, which provides electrical connectivity from the enclosed die to

the outside world. The substrate converts the die’s fine pitch and small pads to a pad size and pitch

that can be easily assembled on a printed circuit board. In the case of a multichip module, the

substrate or interposer also provides electrical connectivity to other dies on the interposer or

substrate. Typically the substrates are electrically tested by the substrate manufacturer and only

known good substrates (KGSu) are shipped to the OSAT. In the case of a 2.5D interposer, since the

interposers are shipped to the OSAT as full thickness wafers, top to bottom connections on the

interposer can only be checked after the wafer is thinned and TSVs are exposed. In the case of 3D

chips, known good die (KGD) are stacked and bonded over each other. However, in the case of SiPs,

either KGD or known good devices are populated onto the substrate or interposer.

Figure 1: Traditional Test Insertion Points for Semiconductor Test

As shown in Figure 1, the standard test insertion points during traditional semiconductor test

at an OSAT are Wafer Sort (WS), Final Test (FT) and, in some cases, System Level Test (SLT). At

Wafer Sort, OSAT’s use automated test equipment (ATE) and automated probers that handle full

thickness wafers (~800 µm). Here devices are tested for functionality rather than performance. After