QLF08_LaBel.pdf - 第20页
IC and Component Selection for Space Sy stems – Presented by Kenneth A . LaBel 20 IC’ s with no Guarantee or Heritage • Radiation testing is required in the vast majority of cases – T esting complexities and challenges a…

IC and Component Selection for Space Systems – Presented by Kenneth A. LaBel
19
Archival Radiation Performance –
Flight Heritage
• Can we make use of parts with
flight heritage and no ground
data for new mission?
• Similar flow to using archival
ground data exist, but consider
as well
– Statistical significance of the
flight data
• Environment severity?
• Number of samples?
• Length of mission?
– Has storage of devices affected
radiation tolerance or reliability?
– And so forth
• This approach is rarely
recommended by the radiation
experts
Some heritage designs last
better than others

IC and Component Selection for Space Systems – Presented by Kenneth A. LaBel
20
IC’s with no Guarantee or Heritage
• Radiation testing is required in
the vast majority of cases
– Testing complexities and
challenges are discussed
elsewhere (e.g., Swift during this
short course, LaBel during the
conference)
– The true challenge is to gather
sufficient data in a cost and
schedule effective manner.
• A backup plan should be made in
case device fails to pass radiation
criteria.
• Reliability testing has similar
concerns
FPGA-based motherboard
SDRAM mounted on a daughtercard
“Abandon all hope, ye’ who enter here”

IC and Component Selection for Space Systems – Presented by Kenneth A. LaBel
21
Is Testing Always Required?
• Exceptions for testing may include
– Operational
• Ex., The device is only powered on once per orbit and the
sensitive time window for a single event effect is minimal
– Acceptable data loss
• Ex., System level error rate may be set such that data is
gathered 95% of the time. This is data availability. Given
physical device volume and assuming every ion causes
an upset, this worst-case rate may be tractable.
– Negligible effect
• Ex., A 2 week mission on a shuttle may have a very low
TID requirement. TID testing could be waived.
A FLASH memory may be acceptable
without testing if a low TID
requirement exists or not powered on
for the large majority of time.