IPC9850_Surface Mount Equipment Characterization.pdf - 第41页

IPC-9850 Official Proposal May 2001 41 Appendix C Guidelines for Adhesive Used for Machine Capability Testing (Selection and Application) C-1 Background Based on experience by the participating members of the IPC Assembl…

IPC-9850

Official Proposal

May 2001

Appendix B: Specification Limits for Cpk Values

Definitions:

Process Spread = Standard Deviation of Data Set = SD

Process Mean Average of Data Set = Avg

Process Target = Target

Upper Specification Limit =USL

Lower Specification Limit =LSL

For a centered process Target =0 and thus USL=LSL

Define Specification Limit for a Centered Process = SL = USL=-1*LSL.

Define Specification Width SW = USL-LSL, thus for a Centered Process

SW=SL-(-1*SL)= 2*SL

Define a General Process Capability Index Cp and Cpk as

Cp= SW/(6*SD)

and

Cpk=Cp*(1-K)

Where,

K= (Target-Avg)/(SW/2)

For a centered Process

Cp=2*SL/(6*SD)=SL/(3*SD)

Cpk=(SL/(3*SD))*(1-K) Where K=(0-Avg)/(2*SL/2))=-Avg/SL

Substituting for Cp and K in the Cpk expression yields

Cpk=(SL/(3*SD))*(1--Avg/SL)=SL/(3*SD)+SL*Avg/(3*SD*SL)=SL/(3*SD)+Avg/(3*SD)

Solving for the SL in the Cpk expression yields

SL=3*SD*(Cpk-Avg/(3*SD))=3*SD*Cpk+|Avg|

Example:

X Average=-9.7 micrometers

X Std Dev = 15.9 micrometers

Y Average = 7.6 micrometers

Y Std Dev = 21.7 micrometers

Thus for a Cpk of 2 the SL for the X-axis is

SL=3*15.9*2+|9.7|=105 micrometers

And the SL for the Y-axis is 122 micrometers.

IPC-9850

Official Proposal

May 2001

Appendix C

Guidelines for Adhesive Used for Machine Capability Testing (Selection and Application)

C-1 Background

Based on experience by the participating members of the IPC Assembly Equipment Subcommittee, it was

recommended that a guideline be written for the selection and application of adhesive used for machine capability

testing. It was the Subcommittee's preference to not specify the exact adhesive to use but to establish a guideline that

would give some direction for users to select and apply adhesive while performing machine capability tests.

Improper selection and application of adhesive could result in a machine performance to be misrepresented. In other

words, the data will show a machine to look worse than it actually is.

C-2Purpose

The purpose of this guideline is to provide a user wishing to perform a machine capability test some direction for the

selection and application of adhesive. The adhesive is used to hold the test parts onto the glass plate during machine

placement. The adhesive also holds the parts in place until an accurate measurement can be taken using a verified

CMM (Coordinate Measurement Machine). The adhesive should perform such that the parts do not move more dm a

specified amount in actual conditions in which the glass plate is subjected to. The actual conditions being time,

temperature and movement of the glass plate.

C-3 Materials / Equipment

It is the intent of the Subcommittee not to specify the adhesive to be used. Based on experience of the members of

this Subcommittee, a spray adhesive is not stable enough and can be very inconsistent. This guideline is intended for

use with tape or sheet adhesive. This guideline will provide information to select an adequate adhesive and

instructions on how to best apply it. At some point in the future, the Subcommittee may elect to set up a process or

system to acquire a specific adhesive through IPC if the members see benefit to do so and EPC is in agreement.

The CMM to be used is assumed to be calibrated and in proper working order. The CMM must have been verified to

be acceptable using the GR & R procedure that this Subcommittee has set forth. The procedure specifies the glass

plate, parts, placement patterns and conditions for performing the GR&R study.

The glass plate and parts that are used to test a particular adhesive should be the same glass plate and part types that

will be used to conduct the placement tests needed to report machine capability per the IPC specification.

C-4 Procedure

1. Clean the glass plate and parts (if applicable) using alcohol free glass cleaner and lint free cloth.

2. Tape the area of placement with the double side adhesive. It is recommended that the adhesive be pre-cut to size.

The biggest problem with applying adhesive is stretching the adhesive and applying is under stress. The adhesive

then moves after the parts have been placed. To avoid this, purchase the adhesive pre-cut or dispense and cut the

adhesive avoiding stretch instead of pulling and tearing.

3. For test parts other that chips, strips of adhesive smaller than the test parts should be used versus a full sheet. This

will promote removal of test parts, particularly, glass test parts.

4. While applying tape, ensure minimal air bubbles.

5. After the adhesive is applied, verify it is in the correct position and flat.

6. Carefully remove the backing from the adhesive so as not to lift the adhesive from the glass board.

7. Run the glass plate using the same glass plate and part types that will be used to conduct the placement tests. The

placement tests are those which have been defined by the Subcommittee.

8. Take the glass plate with parts placed to the CMM for measurement immediately. The glass plate should be

transported in a horizontal position. Movement should be minimized as well as conditions such as temperature.

9. Measurements should be taken and output generated for later comparison.

IPC-9850

Official Proposal

May 2001

10. The glass plate should be re-measured at some time period after the first measurement. It is recommended that

the glass plate be re-measured for comparison at worst case intervals at which are expected by the user. The worst

case scenario would be the longest period at which would be expected to elapse between placement and

measurement. As a minimum, two hours should elapse between the first measurement and re-measurement.

II. Other re-measurements can be taken after simulating movement conditions or temperature changes.

12. Some adhesives are capable of being re-used. If this is planned for the application, Ns same series of tests should

be repeated for each re-use of the adhesive to establish the frequency at which the adhesive should be re-applied.

The obvious best case would be to re-apply after each test. As a reminder, poor adhesive will only worsen end

results.

13. Measurements should be compared from the initial measurement to all subsequent measurements to look for

changes or movement of parts after placement.

14. For the adhesive to be acceptable, the maximum movement that can be observed between the initial

measurement and re-measurements should be a maximum of two (2) microns.

C-5 Results / Summary

Poor adhesive, improper application of adhesive, poor measurement re-use of adhesive and many other factors affect

test results for machine capability measurement. By following these guidelines, only better results can be obtained.

Failure to do so may degrade the perceived performance of a placement machine.