VDA_6.3_EN_Yellow_Volume_22-05-16.pdf - 第32页

30 5.6 Follow-up activi ties after co ntract award The results of the potential analy sis are used a s input wh en planning the se - lection or imple mentation of method s (e.g. pro cess audit, VDA MLA). Once a contra ct…

Interpretation of results

Green

= Fully approved supplier

The supplier has the potential to meet the customer’s requirements to the ex-

tent required and may be considered for awarding a contract.

The customer can award a contract for the project, component or product

group without restriction.

Yellow

= conditionally approved supplier

With regard to the scope of products requested, a contract can only be

awarded under certain conditions. In some cases, the supplier needs support

from the customer in order to meet the requirements of the project. Under

certain conditions, a limited approval for contract award may be given, e.g.:

• Restriction to a defined quantity (small-scale production)

• Restriction to a product/process with limited complexity

• Restriction to only a part of the requested scope of supply

• The supplier is included in a supplier development program

Note: Conditions must be specified between the relevant quality and procure-

ment departments.

Red

= barred supplier

It is not possible to award a contract covering the project, component

or product group in question.

Note: In individual cases (e.g. if there is no alternative supplier), the manage-

ment board can make the decision to award a contract. In this case, qualifica-

tion measures must be initiated, and safeguarding measures must be initiated

and implemented.

5.6 Follow-up activities after contract award

The results of the potential analysis are used as input when planning the se-

lection or implementation of methods (e.g. process audit, VDA MLA).

Once a contract has been awarded, the implementation of measures accord-

ing to the action plan is mandatory.

The quality capability can only be validated (in terms of a release for series

production) by means of a PPA process covering the customer-specific scope

of delivery concerned. To achieve this, a process audit can be conducted

within the scope of a process release.

6 Evaluating a process audit for material products

6.1 Evaluation of the individual questions

Each question is evaluated in terms of fulfillment of the respective require-

ments and the risk involved. For each question, 0, 4, 6, 8 or 10 points can be

awarded. The number of points awarded is based on proven fulfillment of the

requirements as well as the risk assessment regarding the product and the

process.

Points

Assessment of compliance with the requirements

The requirements are fully met; conformity is ensured

The requirements are mainly++ met; minor non-conformity

The requirements are partially met; significant non-conformity

The requirements are inadequately met; major non-conformity

The requirements are not met

) The term “mainly” means that there are only individual cases in which fulfillment of the

requirements could not be proven, and there are no special risks.