VDA_6.3_EN_Yellow_Volume_22-05-16.pdf - 第93页

91 P6.5.3* If product and process requirements are not met, are the causes analyzed and the corrective actions checked for effectiveness? Minimum requirements relevant for assessment Examples for implementation If produc…

P6.5.2 Is quality and process data collected in a way that allows for analysis?

Minimum requirements relevant for assessment

Examples for implementation

The quality and process parameters required to

demonstrate product conformity (target values) are

defined and documented. The actual data is rec-

orded and evaluated.

Special incidents are documented.

The recorded data can be allocated to a product

and process, the data is available, legible, accessi-

ble and archived as specified. Traceability require-

ments are met.

The collected data is analyzed, and appropriate im-

provement measures are initiated.

The potential for improvement must be continuously

determined based on findings relating to quality,

costs, and services.

• Control charts

• Check sheet

• Types of errors/error fre-

quencies

• Rejects/rework

• Process data sheet with pa-

rameter changes

• Shift/machine log

• Cycle times, throughput

times

• Fault message (e.g. plant

standstill, power outage, pro-

gram error message)

• Output/availability

• Blocking message/sorting

actions

• Traceability

P6.5.3* If product and process requirements are not met, are the causes

analyzed and the corrective actions checked for effectiveness?

Minimum requirements relevant for assessment

Examples for implementation

If product and process requirements are not met,

immediate actions are taken to fulfill the require-

ments, until it has been proven that the corrective

actions have been effective. The employees are fa-

miliar with these immediate corrective actions.

Suitable methods are implemented to analyze the

causes.

Repeat errors are recorded. A more detailed analy-

sis of the causes must be carried out accordingly.

Corrective actions are derived, their implementation

is monitored and the effectiveness verified,

The production control plan and the risk analysis

are updated as needed.

Non-conformities that affect the characteristics of

the delivered product are communicated to the cus-

tomer.

• 8D method

• Cause and effects diagram

• Taguchi, Shainin

• 5W method

• Process capability analysis

• Design and process FMEA

• Waivers/concessions

• Additional dimensional, ma-

terial, functional and endur-

ance testing

P6.5.4 Are processes and products audited regularly?

Minimum requirements relevant for assessment

Examples for implementation

The audit program for process and product audits is

based on customer requirements as well as specific

risks. And is implemented.

The process and product audits carried out are suit-

able to identify specific risks and weaknesses.

If non-conformities are detected during an audit, the

causes are analyzed. Corrective actions are de-

rived, their implementation is monitored and the ef-

fectiveness is verified.

Non-conformities that affect products which have

already been delivered are communicated to the

customer.

• Specifications

• Special characteristics

• Audit program including

scheduled and event-based

audits

• Frequency of audits

• Audit results, audit reports,

action plans

• Auditor qualification

• Scope of the audit, e.g.: P5,

P6, P7

• Labeling, packaging

• Change status of individual

parts and software