VDA_6.3_EN_Yellow_Volume_.pdf.pdf - 第30页
28 The assessmen t result is b ased on the traffic light s ystem (“red”, “ yellow” or “green”). Assessment of individual q uestions The requirement of the question is not me t. The requirement of the question is partiall…
27
5.4 The process of conducting a potential analysis
The following diagram illustrates the process of conducting a potential analy-
sis (P1). The evaluation questions in P1 are selected from process elements
P2 to P7. An overview of the questions is provided in section 7.1.
The analysis of the supplier’s processes is based on a comparable prod-
uct/production process using the P1 questionnaire and, if required,
knowledge databases relating to the scope of delivery under consideration.
Figure 5-1: Process of conducting a potential analysis
5.5 Evaluation of a potential analysis
A separate evaluation is required for the potential analysis because the objec-
tive here is less to arrive at a classification in percentage-terms and more to
decide on “suitable” or “not suitable”.
Each question is evaluated in terms of fulfillment of the respective require-
ment and the risk involved.
If a question is not evaluated (shown as n. e.), the reason for this must be
stated. A maximum of 3 questions may be marked n. e. Otherwise, the results
may no longer be comparable.
28
The assessment result is based on the traffic light system (“red”, “yellow” or
“green”).
Assessment of individual questions
The requirement of the question is not met.
The requirement of the question is partially met.
The requirement of the question is met.
If a question is marked “red” or “yellow”, the findings and the relevant evi-
dence must be documented.
The overall assessment result of the potential analysis is calculated from the
number of questions rated as red/yellow/green:
Classification
Evaluation based on questionnaire
Yellow
Red
Barred supplier
more than 12
one or more
Conditionally approved
supplier
max. 12
none
Approved supplier
max. 6
none
A positive potential analysis result (“green”, “yellow”) does not necessarily
lead to a contract being awarded.
A negative potential analysis result (“red”) excludes a contract award.
R
Y
G
R
Y
G
29
Interpretation of results
Green
= Fully approved supplier
The supplier has the potential to meet the customer’s requirements to the ex-
tent required and may be considered for awarding a contract.
The customer can award a contract for the project, component or product
group without restriction.
Yellow
= conditionally approved supplier
With regard to the scope of products requested, a contract can only be
awarded under certain conditions. In some cases, the supplier needs support
from the customer in order to meet the requirements of the project. Under
certain conditions, a limited approval for contract award may be given, e.g.:
• Restriction to a defined quantity (small-scale production)
• Restriction to a product/process with limited complexity
• Restriction to only a part of the requested scope of supply
• The supplier is included in a supplier development program
Note: Conditions must be specified between the relevant quality and procure-
ment departments.
Red
= barred supplier
It is not possible to award a contract covering the project, component
or product group in question.
Note: In individual cases (e.g. if there is no alternative supplier), the manage-
ment board can make the decision to award a contract. In this case, qualifica-
tion measures must be initiated, and safeguarding measures must be initiated
and implemented.