VDA_6.3_EN_Yellow_Volume_.pdf.pdf - 第71页
69 7.5 Supplier managemen t (P5) Process element P5: Supplier management P5.1 Are only approved suppliers used who are able to meet the quality re- quirements? Minimum requirements relevant for assess- ment Examples for …

68
P4.9* Is there a controlled method for the project handover from development
to series production?
Minimum requirements relevant for assess-
ment
Examples for implementation
There is a process for transferring work results
from the project to series production.
The activities specified in the project plan have
been implemented. Deadlines have been set for
aspects that are still to be clarified, and responsi-
ble persons have been appointed.
Successful internal release and customer release
is a prerequisite for a series delivery release.
Measures resulting from internal and external re-
leases are implemented on time.
Personnel are available in accordance with the
planning and are qualified.
The material resources for series production are
available in accordance with the planning.
Measures to secure the production start-up have
been specified and introduced.
For products with integrated (embedded) soft-
ware, the results from development (including in-
termediate results and their documentation) are
recorded.
The industrialization is ensured.
Product/process development
• Customer requirements
• PPA records
• Handover protocols/checklists
with handover criteria, ac-
ceptance reports
• Parts history
• Key production figures such as
OEE, ppm, reject rate, etc.
• Experiences from the ongoing
project
• Personnel resources (produc-
tion staff, process engineers,
maintenance, etc.)
• Material resources (machines
and plants, buildings, access
routes, inspection facilities,
load carriers, packaging, etc.)
• Change log, Release Note
• Industrialization of software: in-
cludes flashing software onto
the control unit in series pro-
duction and coding

69
7.5 Supplier management (P5)
Process element P5: Supplier management
P5.1 Are only approved suppliers used who are able to meet the quality re-
quirements?
Minimum requirements relevant for assess-
ment
Examples for implementation
In series production, it must be ensured that only
approved suppliers are used. The relevant ap-
proval criteria have been defined.
When selecting suppliers and in order to assess
their ability to meet quality requirements, a pro-
cess audit must be planned and carried out de-
pending on the risk classification of the compo-
nent.
Evaluations of the quality performance of existing
suppliers have been taken into consideration.
Risks in the supply chain (internal/external) have
been identified, evaluated and mitigated using
suitable measures.
In case of suppliers appointed by the customer
(directed suppliers), interface agreements are
taken into consideration.
• Defined criteria for the selection
of suppliers
• QM agreements
• In case of criteria that have not
been met: evidence of
measures being implemented in
order to mitigate risks
• Assessment of the suppliers’
ability to meet quality require-
ments, e.g. by means of KPI
(ppm, delivery performance),
escalation level
• Self-Assessment, audit results
of the suppliers
• ASPICE assessment results
• VDA 6.3-Process Audit
• VDA 6.3-Potential Analysis

70
P5.2 Are the customer requirements taken into account in the supply chain?
Minimum requirements relevant for assess-
ment
Examples for implementation
The communication of customer requirements
must be regulated and traceable.
Change management must also be taken into
account during series production.
In case of suppliers appointed by the customer
(directed suppliers), interface agreements are
taken into consideration.
• Requirements from: drawings,
components, software or com-
ponent specifications, mile-
stone plans, QM agreements or
other valid standards
• Special characteristics
• Requalification requirements
• Forwarding of complaints, in-
cluding measures
• Statutory and regulatory re-
quirements
P5.3 Have targets for supplier performance been agreed upon, and is the
achievement of these targets regularly assessed?
Minimum requirements relevant for assess-
ment
Examples for implementation
Target agreements regarding delivery perfor-
mance must be made with all direct suppliers and
must be implemented.
Supplier performance must be checked and evalu-
ated within defined periods and according to de-
fined criteria.
If the agreed targets are not met, measures must
be defined and their implementation including
deadlines must be monitored.
In case of suppliers appointed by the customer (di-
rected suppliers), interface agreements are taken
into consideration.
• Measurable targets: Delivery
quantity, punctuality, failure
rate, PPM, special deliveries,
rejects, lead times for com-
plaints
• Escalation criteria according
to QM agreements
• Evidence of measures (devel-
opment programs) being im-
plemented in case of suppliers
that do not meet the required
delivery performance