IPC-SM-782A 表面安装设计和焊盘设计标准(带BGA).pdf - 第66页
There are various tools available for removing components. Resistance heating tweezers are also used for removing surface mounted components. V arious types of hot air/gas and IR systems are also used for removing surfac…

laminar. The turbulent wave serves to provide an adequate
amount of solder across the surface of the packaging and
interconnecting structure in order to help eliminate outgas-
sing and solder skips. The laminar wave is used to help
eliminate icicles and bridging.
7.4.2 Vapor Phase Soldering
Vapor phase soldering, also
known as condensation soldering, uses the latent heat of
vaporization of an inert liquid for soldering. The latent heat
is released as the vapor condenses on the part to be sol-
dered. The soldering temperature is constant and is con-
trolled by the type of fluid. Thus, unlike wave, IR, convec-
tion and laser soldering, vapor phase soldering does not
require control of the heat input to the solder joints or to
the board. It heats independent of the part geometry, heats
uniformly, and does not exceed the fluid boiling tempera-
ture. This process is also suitable for soldering odd-shaped
parts, flexible circuits, and pins and connectors, as well as
for reflow of tin-lead electroplate and surface mount pack-
ages. Since heating is by condensation, the rate of tempera-
ture rise depends on the mass of the part. Therefore, the
leads on the package in contact with the packaging and
interconnecting structure heat up faster than the component
body. This may lead to wicking of the solder up the lead.
All these features make vapor phase soldering an easily
automated process. It does not necessarily require the flux-
ing, preheating and soldering adjustments so critical in
other process, although prebaking and preheating is recom-
mended to remove moisture and reduce thermal shock in
the boards. Vapor phase soldering is amenable to automa-
tion but does have process related problems such as a
higher incidence of solder balls, part movement, which can
be advantageous for alignment, and damage to
temperature-sensitive parts.
Both inline and batch type systems are available. The inline
system is suitable for mass production. For low volume
production or for research and development, a batch pro-
cess is generally used. For both processes, the major disad-
vantage is price of the liquid due to vapor loss. The batch
process minimizes vapor loss by using a less expensive
secondary fluid as a blanket over the primary fluid. Vapor
loss does not change, but a cheap vapor is substituted for
expensive ones. The cooling coils are used to minimize
vapor loss.
7.4.3 IR Reflow
In infrared (IR) reflow soldering, the
radiant or convective energy is used to heat the assembly.
There are basically two types of IR reflow process—
focused (radiant) and nonfocused (convective). The latter is
proving more desirable for SMT. The focused IR radiates
heat directly on the parts and may unevenly heat assem-
blies. The heat input on the part may also be color depen-
dent. In nonfocused or diffused IR, the heating medium can
be air or an inert gas or simply the convection energy. A
gradual heating of the assembly is necessary to drive off
volatiles from the solder paste. After an appropriate time in
preheat, the assembly is raised to the reflow temperature
for soldering and then cooled.
7.4.4 Hot Air
7.4.5 Laser Reflow Soldering
Laser soldering is a rela-
tive newcomer to the soldering technology. It complements
other soldering processes rather than replacing them and,
as with in-line reflow soldering, it lends itself well to auto-
mation. It is faster than hand soldering but not as fast as
wave, vapor, IR soldering or hot air convection. Heat-
sensitive components that may be damaged in reflow pro-
cesses can be soldered by laser. Process problems include
thermal damage to surrounding areas and solder balls.
7.5 Cleaning
Cleaning of surface mount assemblies, in
general, is harder than that of conventional assemblies
because of smaller gaps between surface mount compo-
nents and the packaging and interconnecting structure and
because of the more complex solder paste residues left on
the assembly and under components. The smaller gap may
entrap flux which may cause potential reliability problems
if the packaging and interconnecting assembly is not prop-
erly cleaned. Hence the cleaning process to be used is
dependent upon the spacing between component leads,
spacing between the components and substrate, the source
of the flux residue and the soldering process.
Flux requiring solvent cleaning—synthetic or rosin based
fluxes are generally known as synthetic activated (SA),
synthetic mildly activated (SMA), rosin activated (RA) or
rosin mildly activated (RMA). Stabilized halogenated
hydrocarbon/alcohol azeotropes are the preferred solvents
for removal of synthetic and rosin based flux residues.
Flux requiring a water clean process—Companies that use
organic acid (OA) flux for reflow or wave soldering must
filter residue from water before disposal. Residues from
OA fluxes are generally removed with water.
Requirements for cleaning are dependent upon the type of
equipment as classified in Section 1.3. Some individuals do
not clean assemblies used for products; however, assembly
performance is predicated on the type of flux being used to
assist in the soldering operation.
ANSI/J-STD-001 provides characteristics of various fluxes
correlated to cleaning procedures. Users are cautioned to
thoroughly understand the corrosive or conductive proper-
ties of the flux and flux residue, before making a decision
on whether to clean or not to clean based on the end prod-
uct environment of the equipment.
7.6 Repair/Rework The repair/rework of surface mount
assemblies requires special care. Because of the small land
geometries, heat applied to the board should be minimized.
December 1999 IPC-SM-782A
57
电子技术应用 www.ChinaAET.com

There are various tools available for removing components.
Resistance heating tweezers are also used for removing
surface mounted components. Various types of hot air/gas
and IR systems are also used for removing surface
mounted components. One of the main issues when using
hot air/gas devices is preventing damage to adjacent com-
ponents.
No matter which system tool is used, all the controlling
desoldering/soldering variables, such as number of times a
component can be removed and replaced, desoldering tem-
perature and time, and damage to the packaging/
interconnection assembly, need to be addressed.
IPC-SM-782A December 1999
58
电子技术应用 www.ChinaAET.com

Land Pattern Details
The information in the following sections is intended to represent requirements for families of surface-mountable compo-
nents that have been standardized by standard developers throughout the world (e.g., EIA, JEDEC, and EIAJ). The prin-
ciples used in the data embody the concepts of ‘‘design for manufacturability,’’ and specify criteria for analysis or modifi-
cation in order to make the manufacturing process as robust as possible.
Each component family type has been organized into a four-page set that has its own number identification (a paragraph
number of the mother document—IPC-SM-782) and its own revision status. As changes are necessary (the addition or dele-
tion of information, or corrections to modify the text or numerical data), a four-page signature(s) will be reissued as a set
for replacement in this handbook.
A summary of the contents with revision status is provided at the conclusion of this explanation.
Introduction
Page 1 of each data set (four-page signature) provides general information about the part, its usage or performance require-
ments, and techniques for handling the attachment of the component. Any useful information about the particular compo-
nent type is detailed on this introductory page.
Component Dimensions
Page 2 of each data set describes the critical component dimensions necessary to make judgements for reliable mounting
recommendations. The standards organizations provide many more dimensions to define the requirements for manufacturing
the specific components in a family class; only those dimension that are necessary for land pattern development are repeated
on page 2 of each data set.
Every attempt has been made to check and correlate the dimensions used against the published standard. Unfortunately, the
standards do not always provide adequate information, or full disclosures of maximum and least material conditions of the
component dimensions used in land pattern development. At times, the numbers shown in the data set have been enhanced
(nominal dimensions converted to maximum/minimum dimensions), at times the numbers shown have been derived (termi-
nal dimensions subtracted from an overall dimension with their inherent tolerances considered in an RMS condition), and
at other times the dimensions have been tailored (total tolerances spread between maximum/minimum limits reduced to a
reasonable amount) in order to facilitate a producible land pattern and assembly.
Users are encouraged to check with their component suppliers in order to ascertain that the suppliers certify to the numbers
used on page 2 in order to use the registered land patterns on page 3. In the event of disparities, if they are component-
supplier specific, users are encouraged to modify their use of the land patterns shown on page 3 in accordance with the prin-
ciples outlined in Section 3.3 on the registered land patterns dimensioning system. If the disparities are industry specific,
please inform the IPC using the form at the end of this section to initiate a data set change.
Land Pattern Dimensions
Page 3 of the data set provides the details for the land pattern. Since the design concepts are dedicated to establishing the
most favorable solder joint conditions, all land pattern dimensions are shown at maximum material condition (MMC). This
is the ‘‘target value’’ for the board manufacturer; moving away from MMC to the least material condition (LMC) reduces
the opportunity for formation of the optimum solder fillet. The LMC dimensions should not exceed the fabrication (F)
allowance shown on page 4. The LMC and the MMC provide the limits for each dimension.
In addition to specifying maximum and minimum limits, the resultant land width is provided as a reference (dimension
‘‘Y’’). Designers are encouraged to incorporate the MMC conditions into their library symbols, and when sending electronic
data to their board manufacturer they should identify that the data is at MMC. Specifying minimum conductor width as a
manufacturing goal should be avoided, since the manufacturer is compensating and scaling data to accommodate process
allowances in the phototool, and is concentrating on meeting minimum requirements. This is opposite to the desire to have
robust land patterns which should be at maximum material conditions.
Page 3 also provides an area around the land pattern known as the ‘‘grid courtyard.’’ The description is in the 0.05 mm ele-
ments of the international grid. An area described as 4x6 is equal to 2.00 mm by 3.00 mm. When placing parts on a printed
board, the highest density is when one courtyard touches another. Courtyards are intended to encompass the land pattern
and a component body that is centered on the land pattern.
December 1999 IPC-SM-782A
59
电子技术应用 www.ChinaAET.com