IPC-TM-650 EN 2022 试验方法--.pdf - 第609页
Figure 1 Cable Connectio n Device The Institute for Int erconnecting and Packaging E lectronic Circuits 2215 Sanders Road • Northbrook, IL 60062 Material in this T est M ethods Manual was voluntarily establis hed by T ec…

Figure 5 Connection of Impedance Probe to Sample
under Test
IPC-TM-650
Number
Subject Date
Revision
Page 4 of 4
7/84
2.5.18
B
Characteristic
Impedance
Flat
Cables
(Unbalanced)
6
Notes
6.1
The
TDR
employs
a
pulse
rise
time
less
than
250
pico¬
seconds.
A
pulse
of
this
rise
time
is
extremely
rich
in
harmon¬
ics
extending
well
into
the
GHz
region
of
the
frequency
spec¬
trum.
The
impedance
probe
illustrated
in
Figure
1
is
designed
to
minimize
the
effects
of
impedance
mismatch
at
the
con¬
nection;
therefore,
it
is
suggested
that
a
probe
of
this
type
be
used
for
the
impedance
measurement.
The
importance
of
a
good
connection
between
the
cable
under
test
and
the
TDR
can
not
be
overemphasized.
Cables
longer
than
3
m
in
length
may
be
tested,
but
care
must
be
exercised
so
as
not
to
confuse
the
effect
of
increased
wire
resistance
with
an
apparent
increase
in
impedance
as
the
magnifier
delay
dial
is
rotated
to
observe
the
longer
cable
length
(function
of
attenuation,
which
includes
wire
size).
6.2
Under
no
circumstances
should
the
cable
be
tested
while
in
a
coiled
form
due
to
the
effect
of
increased
induc¬
tance.
6.3
Keep
cable
a
minimum
of
1
5
cm
away
from
any
dielec¬
tric
or
ground
plane
including
metal,
wood,
etc.
(except
in
step
5.5).
6.4
Measurement
of
Zo
of
unknown
cable
length
should
be
made
as
close
as
possible
to
the
cable
connection
device
(after
overshoot
and
undershoot).
6.5
The
reference
Zo
cable
may
be
positioned
after
the
RG58C
cable
and
before
the
cable
connection
device.
There¬
fore,
the
reference
Zo
is
adjacent
to
the
test
cable
on
the
TDR
trace.

Figure 1 Cable Connection Device
The Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits
2215 Sanders Road • Northbrook, IL 60062
Material in this Test Methods Manual was voluntarily established by Technical Committees of the IPC. This material is advisory only
and its use or adaptation is entirely voluntary. IPC disclaims all liability of any kind as to the use, application, or adaptation of this
material. Users are also wholly responsible for protecting themselves against all claims or liabilities for patent infringement.
Equipment referenced is for the convenience of the user and does not imply endorsement by the IPC.
Page 1 of 3
回
IPC-TM-650
TEST
METHODS
MANUAL
1
Scope
This
method
describes
the
test
procedures
required
to
measure
propagation
delay
in
flat
cables.
Propa¬
gation
delay
is
defined
as
the
time
required
for
a
pulse
to
traverse
a
unit
length
of
cable.
Excessive
propagation
delay
will
result
in
the
malfunction
of
critical
circuits
due
to
the
late
arrival
of
pulses.
Propagation
delay
is
directly
proportional
to
the
effective
dielectric
constant
of
the
insulation.
2
Applicable
Documents
None
3
Test
Specimen
3.1
One
pre-production
or
production
sample
1
m
to
3
m
long.
The
number
of
test
samples
should
be
determined
by
the
manufacturer
and/or
user.
Number
2.5.19
Subject
Propagation
Delay
of
Flat
Cables
Using
Time
Domain
Reflectometer
Date
7/84
Revision
A
Originating
Task
Group
4
Apparatus
4.1
In
this
test,
propagation
delay
is
measured
using
time
domain
reflectometry
(TDR).
Commercial
TDRs
are
readily
available
and
consist
of
a
pulse
generator
and
sampling
oscil¬
loscopes.
The
TDR
to
be
used
should
be
a
Hewlett-Packard
1415A,
Hewlett-Packard
1815A,
Tektronix
1
S2
or
equal.
4.2
Two
standard
cable
connection
devices
to
terminate
each
end
of
the
test
cable,
which
should
match
Figure
1
.
It
is
made
from
a
General
Radio
cable
connector
type
874-C62A.
4.3
A
509
load,
type
GR874
or
equivalent,
to
terminate
the
output
of
the
TDR
RUBBER
INSULATION
COMPLETE
ASSEMBLY
.070
STEEL
WIREWELDED
TO
年)
WELD
TOGETHER
.070
STEELWIRE
5
4
12
I
I
I
PC-2-5-1
8-3

Note:
IPC-TM-650
Number
Subject Date
Revision
Page 2 of 3
2.6.23
Test
Procedure
for
Steam
Ager
Temperature
Repeatability
7/93
Each
thermocouple
shall
be
secured
using
positive
mechani¬
cal
means.
For
example,
the
thermocouple
wire
could
be
wound
around
a
piano
wire
secured
across
the
width
of
the
ager.
The
natural
airflow
within
the
ager
should
be
preserved.
Extra
baffles
or
wire
mesh
screens
should
not
be
included
for
this
test,
if
not
used
during
regular
solderability
testing.
Venting
should
be
preserved
as
it
is
during
normal
testing.
The
end
of
the
thermocouple,
including
the
weld
bead
and
exposed
wires,
should
be
oriented
vertically
(pointing
upward)
to
prevent
water
drops
from
collecting
on
them.
5.3
Performing
the
Test
Turn
on
the
ager
and
allow
to
stabilize
until
measurement
procedures
used
during
regular
testing
indicate
stability
has
been
achieved.
Four
hours
is
usually
required
in
most
agers
to
achieve
stability,
and
this
,,warmup^^
time
should
be
included
in
the
production
part
test
procedure.
Start
the
test,
logging
temperature
every
15
minutes
for
8
hours,
(if
the
data
clearly
indicates
that
the
natural
variability
within
the
chamber
varies
more
quickly,
the
sampling
fre¬
quency
can
be
increased
as
necessary)
When
logging
temperatures,
all
thermocouples
should
be
measured
simultaneously,
or
within
2
minutes
maximum.
Temperatures
shall
be
recorded
in
degrees
Celsius.
Measure
temperature
to
the
nearest
0.1
degree.
The
steam
agers
shall
not
be
disturbed
during
the
test,
except
for
routine
maintenance
or
inspection
procedures;
as
used
during
normal
testing.
The
ager
shall
be
tested
without
other
components
inside.
5.4
Test
Conditions
Test
the
temperature
stability
at
the
temperature
set
point
used
for
solderability
testing.
5.5
Data
Analysis
5.5.1
Record
the
following
data
for
each
test.
a.
Ager
manufacturer
and
model
number
b.
Temperature
indicator
type,
date
of
calibration
c.
Test
date
d.
Sampling
frequency
e.
Total
vent
area
on
chamber
lid
[sq.cm]
f.
Total
chamber
cross-sectional
surface
area
[sq.cm]
g.
Total
volume
of
air
in
chamber
[cu.cm]
h.
Set
point
temperature
i.
Test
location
i.
in
hood
ii.
on
table
against
wall
iii.
on
table
in
open
room
j.
Location
of
room
air
conditioning
vents
(include
sketch)
k.
Notes
on
any
special
conditions
during
test
I.
Distance
from
thermocouples
to
water
level
m.
Location
of
thermocouples
inside
ager
(include
sketch)
n.
Room
temperature
when
testing
5.5.2
Test
Data
Prepare
a
matrix
of
test
data,
showing
temperature
of
each
thermocouple
at
each
sampling
interval.
5.5.3
Control
Charts
Prepare
X-bar
and
R
charts
with
appropriate
control
limits.
A
control
limit
calculation
form
is
shown
in
Appendix
1.
Further
instructions
on
preparation
of
control
charts
can
be
found
in
I
PC-
PC-90
or
ANSI/ASQC
Z1.1, Z1.2,
and
Z1.3.
Subgroups
shall
consist
of
all
thermocouples
placed
in
the
ager
(8
or
10),
and
which
are
measured
simultaneously
during
the
test.
The
charts
shall
be
considered
out
of
control
if
any
of
the
fol¬
lowing
applies:
a.
any
one
data
point
is
beyond
the
control
limits
b.
any
2
or
3
consecutive
points
are
near
a
control
limit
(outer
third)
c.
a
run
of
8
or
more
points
is
above
or
below
the
center
line
d.
a
run
of
6
or
more
points
is
increasing
or
decreasing
5.5.4
Process
Capability
Histogram
Prepare
a
process
capability
histogram,
using
data
ranges
of
1/2℃
or
less.
Estimate
the
mean
and
standard
deviation
of
the
data.
5.5.5
Process
Capability
Index
Calculate
the
process
capability
index,
Cp
using
the
equation
shown
below
(from
IPC-PC-90
example
7.5.
6.2)
for
specification
limits
of
±1℃
[±1.8°F],
±2℃
[±3.6°F],
±3℃[±5.4°F]
and
±4℃[±7.2°F].
Cp
=
USL-LSL
-
6S
Where,
Cp
二
capability
index
USL
=
upper
specification
limit
LSL
=
lower
specification
limit
S
=
process
standard
deviation
Include
a
plot
of
Cp
against
specification
tolerance
range.