IPC-TM-650 EN 2022 试验方法.pdf - 第196页
5.2.4 Immediately also place one drop of the control stan- dard flux adjacent to the test flux. Do not allow the drops to touch. 5.2.5 Place the test panel in a horizontal position in the dust free cabinet at 23 ± 2 °C […

1
Scope
This
test method is designed to determine the
removal effect the flux has (if any) on the bright copper mirror
film which has been vacuum deposited on clear glass.
2 Applicable Documents
IPC J-STD-004
Requirements
for Soldering Fluxes
ASTM
E104
Maintaining
Constant Relative Humidity by
means of Aqueous Solutions
Federal
Specification LLL-R-626
Rosin,
Gum, Rosin Wood
and Rosin Tall Oil
3
Test Specimen
A
minimum of 10 ml of liquid flux, a rep-
resentative container of solder paste, dissolved paste flux,
extracted solder preform flux or extracted cored wire flux. The
reflow/extraction process should be carried out in accordance
with J-STD-004.
4
Apparatus and Reagents
4.1
Control
standard rosin flux, class A, type II, grade WW,
of Federal Specification LLL-R-626.
4.2
Reagent
grade (99% pure) 2-propanol.
4.3
Copper
Mirrors (see 6.2 and 6.3).
4.4
500
ml of reagent grade 0.5% solution of ethylene
diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA).
4.5 Reagent
grade ethanol or methanol.
4.6
Deionized
water with a resistivity of at least 18.0
megohm centimeter.
4.7
Glass
dropper.
4.8
Test
cabinet capable of achieving 23 ± 3 °C [73.4 ±
5.4 °F] and 50 ± 5% relative humidity.
4.9
A
relative humidity gauge havinga±2%accuracy, or
better, shall be used to continuously monitor the test environ-
ment. The gauge should be calibrated periodically.
5
Procedures
5.1 Preparation
5.1.1 Control Standard Flux
Dissolve
35 g of Federal
Specification LLL-R-626 rosin into 100 ml of reagent grade
(99% pure) 2-propanol and stir thoroughly.
5.1.2
Temperature/Humidity Chamber
When
acid or salt
solutions (such as reported in ASTM E104) are used, the envi-
ronment shall be monitored for a minimum of 48 hours prior
to exposing the copper mirror samples, to assure compliance
with the 50% ± 5% relative humidity requirement.
5.1.3
Copper Mirror Test Panels
5.1.3.1
Immediately
before testing, immerse the copper mir-
ror in a 5 g/l solution of EDTA for one minute for copper oxide
removal. Mirrors stored in a nonoxidizing environment do not
require cleaning with the EDTA solution prior to testing. The
cleaning step must be used if test results are in dispute.
5.1.3.2
Rinse
the mirror thoroughly in running deionized
water, immerse in clean ethanol or methanol, and dry with
clean, oil free air.
5.1.3.3
Carefully
examine the mirror before testing. There
must be no oxide.
5.2
Test
5.2.1
Place
the copper mirror test panel on a flat surface,
mirror side up, and protect from dust and dirt at all times.
5.2.2
Place
one drop of test flux or extract to be tested
(approximately 0.05 ml) on the copper mirror test panel. Do
not allow the dropper to touch the test panel.
5.2.3 Apply
solder paste directly to the mirror without
scratching the copper surface. Use a volume approximating
0.5 mm [0.197 in] thickness and 8.0 mm [0.350 in] diameter.
(It has been determined that significant variations from this
quantity have little effect for most materials.)
2215
Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
IPC-TM-650
TEST
METHODS MANUAL
Number
2.3.32
Subject
Flux
Induced Corrosion (Copper Mirror Method)
Date
06/04
Revision
D
Originating Task Group
Flux Specification Task Group (5-24a)
Material
in this Test Methods Manual was voluntarily established by Technical Committees of IPC. This material is advisory only
and its use or adaptation is entirely voluntary. IPC disclaims all liability of any kind as to the use, application, or adaptation of this
material. Users are also wholly responsible for protecting themselves against all claims or liabilities for patent infringement.
Equipment referenced is for the convenience of the user and does not imply endorsement by IPC.
P
age1of2
ASSOCIA
TION CONNECTING
ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES
®
电子技术应用 www.ChinaAET.com

5.2.4
Immediately
also place one drop of the control stan-
dard flux adjacent to the test flux. Do not allow the drops to
touch.
5.2.5
Place
the test panel in a horizontal position in the dust
free cabinet at 23 ± 2 °C [73.4 ± 3.6 °F] and 50 ± 5% relative
humidity for 24 ± 1/2 hours.
5.2.6 At
the end of the 24 hour period, remove the test
panel and remove the test flux and control standard flux by
immersion in clean 2-propanol.
5.3
Evaluation
5.3.1
Carefully
examine the test panel for possible copper
removal or discoloration.
5.3.2
See
J-STD-004 for evaluation criteria.
5.3.3
If
the control flux fails the L category, repeat the entire
test using a new copper mirror test panel.
5.3.4
Discoloration
of the copper film due to a superficial
reaction or only a partial reduction of the copper film thickness
is not considered a failure.
5.3.5
A
number of chemicals can cause failure of copper
mirror: free halides, stronger organic and inorganic acids and
free amines.
6
Notes
6.1 Safety
Observe all appropriate precautions on MSDS
for chemicals involved in this test method.
6.2
Preparation of Copper Mirrors
6.2.1
Apply,
by vacuum deposition, a film of copper metal
on one surface of a flat sheet of clear, polished glass.
6.2.2
Apply
a uniform thickness of approximately 50 nm,
and assure that the finished mirror permits 10 ± 5% transmis-
sion of normal incident light of nominal wave length of 500
nm. This may be determined using a suitable photoelectric
spectrophotometer.
6.2.3
Prevent
oxidation of the copper mirror by storing in a
closed container which has been flushed with nitrogen.
IPC-TM-650
Number
2.3.32
Subject
Flux
Induced Corrosion (Copper Mirror Method)
Date
06/04
Revision
D
P
age2of2
电子技术应用 www.ChinaAET.com

1
Scope
This
qualitative test method is designed to deter-
mine the presence of chlorides and bromides in soldering flux
by visual examination after placement on test paper.
2
Applicable Documents
IPC J-STD-004
Requirements
for Soldering Fluxes
3
Test Specimen
A
minimum of 10 ml of liquid flux, a rep-
resentative container of solder paste, reflowed solder paste
flux, extracted solder preform flux or extracted cored wire flux.
The reflow/extraction process should be carried out in accor-
dance with J-STD-004.
4
Apparatus and Reagents
4.1
Six
pieces of silver chromate test paper 51 mm x
51 mm.
4.2
250
ml of reagent grade 2-propanol.
4.3
Six
glass microscope slides.
4.4
Spatula.
5
Procedures
5.1 Preparation
5.1.1
The
silver chromate paper is extremely light sensitive
and must be stored in a closed container away from light until
used for testing.
5.1.2
To
avoid contamination, the paper must be handled
with forceps and must never be touched with bare hands.
5.2
Test for Liquid Flux or Flux Extract Solution
5.2.1
Place
one drop of test flux or flux extract (approxi-
mately 0.05 ml) on each piece of silver chromate test paper.
Allow the droplet to remain on each test paper for a minimum
of 15 seconds.
5.2.2
After
the 15 seconds, immediately immerse each test
paper in clean 2-propanol to remove the residual organic
materials.
5.2.3
Allow
each test paper to dry and examine for color
change.
5.3
Test for Paste Flux or Solder Paste Flux as Obtained
from the Supplier
5.3.1
Clean
six glass microscope slides with 2-propanol and
air dry.
5.3.2
Moisten
each piece of silver chromate reagent paper
with deionized water.
5.3.3
Apply
a wet paper to each glass slide and remove the
excess water with blotting paper.
5.3.4
Using
a spatula, apply a thin coating of the paste flux
or solder paste directly onto each moist reagent paper.
5.3.5
Allow
the paste flux or solder paste to remain in con-
tact with the paper for 15 seconds, then remove the flux with
2-propanol or other appropriate solvent without disturbing the
paper.
5.3.6
Allow
each test paper to dry and examine for color
change.
5.4
Evaluation
Carefully
examine each test sheet for pos-
sible color change. A change to off-white or yellow-white indi-
cates the presence of chlorides or bromides (see Figure 1).
5.4.1
Interferences
A
number of chemicals besides free
halides may cause test failures. (Representative examples are,
but are not limited to, amines, cyanides, and isocyanates.)
5.4.2
Certain
acidic solutions may react with the reagent
paper to produce a color change similar to that obtained with
chlorides and bromides. When a color change is observed, it
is advisable to check the acidity of the affected area by means
of a pH indicating paper. If pH values of less than 3 are
obtained, the presence of chlorides and bromides should be
verified by other analytical means.
5.4.3
It
is possible that the metal present in a solder paste
sample may leave a white residue that is difficult to distinguish
2215
Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
IPC-TM-650
TEST
METHODS MANUAL
Number
2.3.33
Subject
Presence
of Halides in Flux, Silver Chromate
Method
Date
06/04
Revision
D
Originating Task Group
Flux Specifications Task Group (5-24a)
Material
in this Test Methods Manual was voluntarily established by Technical Committees of IPC. This material is advisory only
and its use or adaptation is entirely voluntary. IPC disclaims all liability of any kind as to the use, application, or adaptation of this
material. Users are also wholly responsible for protecting themselves against all claims or liabilities for patent infringement.
Equipment referenced is for the convenience of the user and does not imply endorsement by IPC.
P
age1of2
ASSOCIA
TION CONNECTING
ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES
®
电子技术应用 www.ChinaAET.com