IPC-TM-650 EN 2022 试验方法.pdf - 第781页

1.0 Scope 1.1 To determine the mechanical strength of the crimped contact-to-conductor joint. 2.0 Reference Documents 2.1 Information in this section is intended to parallel the test method described in EIA-RS-364/TP-08.…

100%1 / 824
1.0 Scope
1.1
To determine the ability of electrical contacts to with-
stand forces tending to displace them from their proper loca-
tion within the connector insert and to resist contact pull out.
These forces may be the result of (a) loads on wire connected
to the contact, (b) forces required to restrict contact ‘‘push
through’’ during assembly of removable type contacts into
connector inserts, during assembly of removable type con-
tacts into connector inserts, (c) forces produced by mating of
contacts during connector mating, (d) dynamic forces pro-
duced by vibration and shock during normal use of the con-
nectors, and (e) forces relating to bundling strains on wire.
2.0 Reference Documents
2.1
Information in this section is intended to parallel the test
method described in EIA-RS-364/TP-29.
3.0 Test Specimen
3.1
A plug and/or receptacle with a full complement of con-
tacts.
4.0 Apparatus
4.1
Force gauge, of suitable range and accuracy to provide
measured values accurate within 2 percent.
4.2 Contact removal and insertion tools as required by the
connector specification.
4.3 Steel test probes to adapt the force gauge plunger to
the front or wiring end of the particular contact (male, female,
or hermaphroditic) under test.
4.4 Device for applying the required load.
5.0 Procedure
NOTE:
All contact positions of the insert shall be filled during
this test.
5.1 All back shell hardware and compression rings shall be
removed to expose the wire side of the connector.
5.2 If possible, the test shall be conducted before wires
have been attached to the contacts.
5.3 The unmated plug or receptacle shall be mounted such
that an axial load can be applied by the force gauge. A mini-
mum of 1/4 inch clearance shall be provided on the opposite
side of the insert to permit any ‘‘push through’’ that might
occur.
NOTE:
The direction(s) in which the test is to be conducted
shall be determined from the individual connector specifica-
tion. If two-directional testing is required, the specified number
of samples shall be divided into equal groups (one group for
each test).
5.4 An axial load shall be applied to the contact at a rate of
approximately one (1) pound per second until the force speci-
fied in the detail specification is reached. The specified force
shall be maintained for a minimum of five (5) seconds.
6.0 Notes
6.1
Acceptance criteria shall be established in terms of (a)
the difference in contact position before and during the appli-
cation of the specified axial force and/or (b) the difference in
contact position before and after the application of the speci-
fied axial force.
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
IPC-TM-650
TEST METHODS MANUAL
Number
3.2
Subject
Contact Retention, Connectors
Date
7/75
Revision
A
Originating Task Group
N/A
Material in this Test Methods Manual was voluntarily established by Technical Committees of the IPC. This material is advisory only
and its use or adaptation is entirely voluntary. IPC disclaims all liability of any kind as to the use, application, or adaptation of this
material. Users are also wholly responsible for protecting themselves against all claims or liabilities for patent infringement.
Equipment referenced is for the convenience of the user and does not imply endorsement by the IPC.
Page1of1
ASSOCIATION CONNECTING
ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES
1.0 Scope
1.1
To determine the mechanical strength of the crimped
contact-to-conductor joint.
2.0 Reference Documents
2.1
Information in this section is intended to parallel the test
method described in EIA-RS-364/TP-08.
3.0 Test Specimen
3.1
A contact and conductor crimped together with the
specified tool.
NOTE:
A contact may be crimped to both ends of the con-
ductor to facilitate fixturing.
4.0 Apparatus
4.1
Clamps, jaws, or other means to hold the contact and
conductor.
4.2 A force measuring device capable of measuring the
specified forces at a rate of travel of 1 ± 1/4 inch per minute.
5.0 Procedure
5.1
The sample shall be mounted in the tensile tester and an
axial force sufficient to rupture the contact-to-conductor crimp
shall be applied. The peak force required to separate the con-
tact from the conductor shall be recorded and shall not be
less than the minimum specified crimp tensile strength as
defined in the individual contact or connector specification for
the particular wire size under test.
5.2 The tested sample shall be visually examined for distor-
tion of the crimp barrel or area to the extent that it is unfit for
further use. The condition of crimp failure shall be noted as
one of the following:
1. Slip (pull-out)
2. Conductor broken within crimp area or immediately adja-
cent to the crimp area (including any strain relief).
6.0 Notes
6.1
Acceptance criteria shall be established as the minimum
acceptable mechanical strength of the crimped connection as
defined by the individual contact or connector specification.
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
IPC-TM-650
TEST METHODS MANUAL
Number
3.3
Subject
Crimp Tensil Strength, Connectors
Date
7/75
Revision
A
Originating Task Group
N/A
Material in this Test Methods Manual was voluntarily established by Technical Committees of the IPC. This material is advisory only
and its use or adaptation is entirely voluntary. IPC disclaims all liability of any kind as to the use, application, or adaptation of this
material. Users are also wholly responsible for protecting themselves against all claims or liabilities for patent infringement.
Equipment referenced is for the convenience of the user and does not imply endorsement by the IPC.
Page1of1
ASSOCIATION CONNECTING
ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES
1.0 Scope
1.1
To determine the effects of subjecting connectors to
mating and unmating cycles simulating the expected life.
2.0 Reference Documents
2.1
Information in this section is intended to parallel the test
method described in EIA-RS-364/TP-09.
3.0 Test Specimen
3.1
One piece connector
3.1.1 A connector (plug and receptacle) complete with all
applicable guide, keying and engaging hardware or a card
edge receptacle.
3.2 Two piece connector
3.2.1 A connector (header and receptacle or plug and
receptacle) complete with all applicable guide, keying and
engaging hardware and appropriate flat cable.
3.3 Unless otherwise specified in the individual connector
specification, the test samples (or engaging hardware) shall
not be lubricated or otherwise coated prior to test.
4.0 Apparatus
4.1
One piece connector.
4.1.1 Test blade as shown in Figure 1 to simulate a mating
printed wiring board of maximum thickness for card edge (one
piece) connector.
4.2 Two piece connector.
4.2.1 The mating connector shall be used to test for dura-
bility of two piece connectors.
4.3 Clamps, jaws, or other means to hold the receptacle
and plug or test blade.
4.4 Automatic or semi-automatic tester to mate and unmate
the connector at the specified rate.
NOTE:
While manual cycling of the connectors is permitted,
proper alignment and orientation is most readily maintained in
a mechanical device specifically designed for this test.
5.0 Procedure
5.1
The sample shall be mounted in the tester, carefully
aligned and fully mated and unmated for the number of cycles
specified in the individual connector specification.
5.2 Unless otherwise specified in the individual connector
specification, the cycling rate shall be 200 to 600 cycles per
hour and no electrical load shall be applied to the samples
during the test.
5.3 At the intervals specified in the individual connector
specification, inspections or tests may be performed.
5.4 After completion of the specified number of cycles, the
sample shall be visually examined for evidence of the follow-
ing which may be excessive or detrimental to the function of
the connector.
A. Wear on engaging hardware.
B. Uneven wear, galling, or removal of plating on contacts,
guide hardware, etc.
C. Free metal chips in the contact area.
D. Displaced, bent, or broken contacts.
E. Pierced resilient inserts or broken or chipped hard dielec-
trics.
6.0 Notes
6.1
Acceptance criteria shall be established in terms of one,
or any combination of the following: (See 5.3)
A. The maximum allowable total mating force during the test.
B. The minimum individual contact separation force during or
after the test.
C. The maximum allowable change in contact resistance
after the test.
D. The degree and criticality of wear and/or component dam-
age resulting from the test.
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
IPC-TM-650
TEST METHODS MANUAL
Number
3.4
Subject
Durability, Connectors
Date
1/83
Revision
B
Originating Task Group
N/A
Material in this Test Methods Manual was voluntarily established by Technical Committees of the IPC. This material is advisory only
and its use or adaptation is entirely voluntary. IPC disclaims all liability of any kind as to the use, application, or adaptation of this
material. Users are also wholly responsible for protecting themselves against all claims or liabilities for patent infringement.
Equipment referenced is for the convenience of the user and does not imply endorsement by the IPC.
Page1of2
ASSOCIATION CONNECTING
ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES