semi合集-English.pdf - 第3891页
SEMI F28-1103 © SEMI 1997, 2003 1 SEMI F28-1103 TEST METHOD FOR MEASURING PARTICLE GENERATION FROM PROCESS PANELS This test method was technically approved b y the Gl obal GasesCommittee and is the direct r esponsibility…

SEMI F27-0997 © SEMI 1997, 2003 5
Regulators should be tested in the fully-open condition
(i.e., with the regulator adjusted for minimum pressure
drop). The quantity of published data on regulator
interaction with moisture is limited, and experiments to
investigate the effect of varying the pressure drop
across the regulator are encouraged but are not part of
this test. MFC’s should be tested with a flow control
device upstream and the MFC not actively controlling
the flow through it (usually referred to as the “purge”
setting). It may not be possible to test a given MFC at
the specified flow if the flow rating of the MFC is much
less than the specified flow. As MFC’s are not expected
to vary greatly in performance according to their flow
rating, MFC’s to be tested should generally be chosen
to be compatible with the table. If this is not possible,
then the MFC should be tested at its rated flow (lower
than the flow in the table). This can then be considered
a conservative test, as the MFC operated at higher flow
would be expected to dry down more quickly.
7.3.2 Particle filters with the same size tubing
connectors often have somewhat different sizes and
very different flow ratings. In order to be able to make
reasonable comparisons between the performance of
different filters, it is essential to test filters of similiar
size at the same flow. However, the flow dependence of
the moisture response of particle filters is more
complex than that of tubing, and they must be tested at
more than one flow in order to model their behavior. In
order to meet this requirement and provide data which
can be readily compared with the conditions under
which the filters can be expected to be used in practice,
filters shall be tested at two flows: The first, according
to the size of the connecting tube stubs, the second, to
be 25% of the rated flow of the filter or 50 slm,
whichever is less.
7.3.3 For systems of components, the system shall be
tested at the lowest flow of those determined for each
component in the system considered separately. If the
system includes a filter, it shall be tested at that flow
and additionally, at 25% of the rated flow of the filter or
50 slm, whichever is less.
Table 1 Flow Rate
Tubing Outer Diameter
(nominal)
Flow (all
components)
Flow for Second
Test on Filters
≥ 1/8", < 1/2"
(≥ 3.2 mm, < 12.7 mm)
6 slm
≥ 1/2"
(≥ 12.7 mm)
13 slm
25% of rated flow
or 50 slm
whichever is less
8 Reporting Results
8.1 Complete moisture response curves for all test
specimens and relevant test blanks should be included.
A summary sheet may compare components in terms of
“induction time,” peak height, and/or decay time.
Temperature, pressure, and flow measurements, and as
complete a record as possible of all experimental
variables should be noted.
NOTICE: SEMI makes no warranties or
representations as to the suitability of the standards set
forth herein for any particular application. The
determination of the suitability of the standard is solely
the responsibility of the user. Users are cautioned to
refer to manufacturer’s instructions, product labels,
product data sheets, and other relevant literature
respecting any materials mentioned herein. These
standards are subject to change without notice.
The user’s attention is called to the possibility that
compliance with this standard may require use of
copyrighted material or of an invention covered by
patent rights. By publication of this standard, SEMI
takes no position respecting the validity of any patent
rights or copyrights asserted in connection with any
item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard
are expressly advised that determination of any such
patent rights or copyrights, and the risk of infringement
of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
Copyright by SEMI® (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials
International), 3081 Zanker Road, San Jose, CA 95134. Reproduction o
f
the contents in whole or in part is forbidden without express written
consent of SEMI.

SEMI F28-1103 © SEMI 1997, 2003 1
SEMI F28-1103
TEST METHOD FOR MEASURING PARTICLE GENERATION FROM
PROCESS PANELS
This test method was technically approved by the Global GasesCommittee and is the direct responsibility of
the North American Gases Committee. Current edition approved by the North American Regional Standards
Committee on September 25, 2003. Initially available at www.semi.org October 2003; to be published
November 2003. Originally published September 1997.
1 Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this document is to define a method
for testing process panels intended for installation in
high-purity gas distribution systems. Application of this
test method is expected to yield comparable data among
process panels tested for the purposes of qualification
for this installation.
1.2 This document describes a test method designed to
draw comparisons of particulate generation
performance of process panels. This test method
evaluates the cleanliness of process panels in the “as
received” condition as well as under normal operating
conditions. The “as received” test is intended to enable
the user to evaluate the fabrication, cleaning, and
packaging techniques of the manufacturer of the
process panel. The test under actual operating
conditions is intended to allow the user to evaluate the
manufacturer’s component selection as well as the
quality of the panel design. The specific flow rates
described in both test methods are representative of
relatively high flow conditions for a typical process
panel.
2 Scope
2.1 This test method addresses total particle counts
greater than the minimum detection limit (MDL) of the
particle counter and does not consider classifying data
into various size ranges.
2.2 This procedure utilizes a particle counter applied to
process panels typically used in semiconductor
applications. It applies to process gas supply systems
(e.g., gas cabinets) which include a process panel, an
inert purge panel, and a system vent. Both automatic
and manual process panels are within the scope of this
test procedure. Panels, as defined in this test method,
are considered to consist of 6.35 mm O. D. × 0.89 mm
wall (1/4" O.D. × 0.035" wall) tubing and components.
NOTICE: This standard does not purport to address
safety issues, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the users of this standard to establish
appropriate safety and health practices and determine
the applicability of regulatory or other limitations prior
to use.
3 Limitations
3.1 This test method specifies flow and mechanical
stress conditions considered typical of conditions which
would be expected under moderately aggressive
operating conditions. These conditions should not
exceed those recommended by the manufacturer.
Actual performance under operating conditions at lower
flow rates or less aggressive conditions may differ. This
test method does not address particle generation under
vibrating conditions.
3.2 The test medium is limited to nitrogen, argon, or
clean dry air (CDA). Performance with other gases may
differ.
3.3 The accuracy of the data generated by this method
is limited to the accuracy of the particle measuring
instruments utilized.
3.4 This method is written with the assumption that the
operator understands the use of the apparatus at a level
equivalent to six months of experience.
3.5 This document is not intended as a methodology
for monitoring on-going particulate performance once a
particular process panel has been tested. Also, this
method does not include extended dynamic particle
count testing (particle generation after thousands of
cycles).
3.6 Auto-crossover systems are not within the scope of
this test procedure.
NOTE 1: It should be mentioned that test results from panels
equipped with final outlet filters can differ significantly from
test results from panels without filters.
4 Referenced Standards
4.1 ISO Standards
1
ISO 14644-1 — Cleanrooms and associated controlled
environments Part 1: Classification of air cleanliness.
1 International Organization for Standardization, ISO Central
Secretariat, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20,
Switzerland. Telephone: 41.22.749.01.11; Fax: 41.22.733.34.30,
Website: www.iso.ch

SEMI F28-1103 © SEMI 1997, 2003 2
ISO 14644-2 — Cleanrooms and associated controlled
environments Part 2: Specifications for testing and
monitoring to prove continued compliance with ISO
14644-1.
NOTICE: Unless otherwise indicated, all documents
cited shall be the latest published versions.
5 Terminology
5.1 Abbreviations and Acronyms
5.1.1 CDA — Clean, dry air
5.1.2 EP — Electropolished
5.1.3 LPC — Laser particle counter
5.1.4 psi — Pounds per square inch
5.1.5 psia — Pounds per square inch absolute
5.1.6 psid — Pounds per square inch differential
5.1.7 psig — Pounds per square inch gauge
5.1.8 scfm — Standard cubic feet per minute
5.1.9 slpm — Standard liters per minute
5.1.10 SL — Standard liters
5.2 Definitions
5.2.1 background counts — counts contributed by the
test apparatus (including counter electrical noise) with a
spool piece in place of the test object.
5.2.2 Compressed Gas Association (CGA) — also
frequently used to refer to a fitting, as defined and
specified by the Compressed Gas Association, which is
used to connect a gas source cylinder to a panel inlet.
5.2.3 condensation nucleus counter (CNC) — a
discrete particle counting instrument that detects
particles, in a gaseous stream, by measuring light
scattered from droplets grown to measurable size by
condensation of supersaturated vapor upon the
particles.
5.2.4 dynamic test — a test performed to determine
particle contribution as a result of valve actuation or
regulator adjustment in a process panel during normal
operation.
5.2.5 process panels — a gas source control piping
system for delivering process gases as defined in SEMI
F13.
5.2.6 sample flow rate — the volumetric flow rate
drawn by the particle counter for particle detection.
5.2.7 sampling time — the time increment over which
counts are recorded.
5.2.8 source pressure — pressure of the source gas
applied to the cylinder connection at the panel inlet.
5.2.9 spool piece — a null component consisting of a
straight piece of electropolished tubing and appropriate
fittings used in place of the test component to establish
the baseline.
5.2.10 standard conditions — 101.3 kPa, 0.0°C (14.73
psia, 32°F).
5.2.11 static test — a test performed on an as-received
process panel with all valves in the fully-open position.
5.2.12 test duration — total time required to complete
the test procedure.
5.2.13 test flow rate — volumetric flow rate of the test
gas at standard conditions as defined in Section 5.2.10.
5.2.14 test pressure — pressure immediately
downstream of the test panel.
6 Test Procedure
6.1 Test Conditions
6.1.1 Precautions — This test method may involve
hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This
test method does not purport to address the safety
considerations associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user to establish appropriate safety
and health practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations before using this method.
6.1.1.1 Exhaust from the CNC may contain hazardous
and/or flammable vapors and should be properly treated
before being released to atmosphere.
6.1.2 The test is to be conducted at a normal indoor
temperature of between 18°C (64°F) and 26°C (78°F).
6.1.3 Test apparatus must be enclosed in a Class 100
environment (per ISO 14644). Use procedures
necessary to maintain Class 100 when handling test
apparatus and test components.
6.1.4 Care should be taken to protect the test apparatus
from excessive vibration. For example, vacuum pumps
and compressors should be isolated from the system.
6.2 Apparatus and Materials
6.2.1 Test Gas — Clean, dry nitrogen or air is to be
used [minimum dryness −60°C dew point at 790 kPa
(100 psig) and < 10 ppm total hydrocarbons]
6.2.2 Filters — Filters are required to provide
“particle-free” test gas. Each filter must be nine-log
retentive, per manufacturer’s specifications, to 0.02 µm
particles and have a pressure drop of less than 6.9 kPa
(1 psid) at the specified test pressure and flow rate. The
filter must be capable of achieving less than 1 particle
3