semi合集-English.pdf - 第7062页

SEMI S17-0701 © SEMI 2001 10 R1-6.4 Sh ield devices, when ch osen, should prevent simul ta neous load/un load operation by a floor-travel i ng vehicle or person and a space-traveling vehicle. R1-6. 5 Protective Device In…

100%1 / 7923
SEMI S17-0701 © SEMI 20019
RELATED INFORMATION 1
PROTECTIVE DEVICE OPTION CONSIDERATION FOR LOAD/UNLOAD
OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT
LOAD STATIONS
NOTE: This Related Information is not an official balloted part of SEMI S17. It is included to assist the user of the
document in making decisions about possible options.
R1-1 Purpose
R1-1.1 This Related Information should act as an
application note for consideration and selection of
safety devices that may be provided to protect
load/unload operations where risks are generated by
space traveling vehicles.
R1-1.2 Space traveling vehicle suppliers are not
required to provide such devices, except as necessary to
comply with local jurisdictional requirements.
NOTE R1-1: Refer to the main document for devices
recommended for protecting equipment.
R1-2 Scope
R1-2.1 Protective Devices As related to UTV
equipment, devices designed to protect personnel or
equipment from injury or damage during raising or
lowering of loads into position.
R1-2.2 Protective devices should be considered when
space-traveling vehicles with hoisting mechanisms are
present.
R1-2.3 Protective devices function to warn of, or
prevent transfer of, loads when personnel or equipment
are at risk.
R1-2.3.1 This application note covers the following
types of devices:
Sensors
Shields
Alarms
Signs and visual alerts
Communication protocol
NOTE R1-2: This should not be considered a complete list
there could be many other solutions.
R1-3 Limitations
R1-3.1 This Related Information is not intended to
apply to situations where load ports are installed only
in locations inaccessible to personnel walking on the
factory floor (such as SEMI E15.1 Option 2 load ports).
R1-3.2 This Related Information does not apply to
factories using only floor-traveling vehicles or PGVs.
R1-4 Considerations
R1-4.1 Protective devices should be considered for
preventing transfer of loads when personnel or
equipment are at risk.
R1-4.2 Protective device integration should be
considered a coordinated effort between UTV supplier,
manufacturing equipment supplier and the end user
customer.
R1-5 Lookdown Sensors
R1-5.1 Lookdown Sensors Such sensors surround
the hoisting mechanism and look down to the loadport
to determine if anything is within the path of descent.
R1-5.2 Lookdown sensors are one type of protective
device that allows for the overhead vehicle to “see” if
there is anything in the expected path of descent.
R1-5.3 Lookdown sensors can serve the function of
protecting equipment from impact.
R1-5.4 Lookdown sensors should be capable of
communicating the need for operator intervention back
to a location that can notify the proper personnel.
R1-6 Shield Options
R1-6.1 Shield Device Shield devices are physical
shielding which is placed to block access to a hazard
area.
R1-6.2 Shield devices, when selected, should be
capable of fitting within the dimensional limitations of
the load ports. (See SEMI E15.1 for dimensional
requirements and exclusion zones for 300 mm load
ports.)
R1-6.3 Shield device types include:
Curtain Sensor
Safety Guard
Automatic Doors
SEMI S17-0701 © SEMI 2001 10
R1-6.4 Shield devices, when chosen, should prevent
simultaneous load/unload operation by a floor-traveling
vehicle or person and a space-traveling vehicle.
R1-6.5 Protective Device Interlocks — These
confirmation signals from shield devices are used to
interrupt the transfer process if a shield is breached.
R1-6.5.1 In the case of UTV systems, protective device
interlocks should communicate to the UTV equipment
either directly or through the manufacturing equipment.
R1-6.5.2 Communication should be via a protected-
path communications protocol that is fail safe.
R1-7 Alarms
R1-7.1 Alarms Alarms consist of audible and visual
notices of hazards that may be approaching.
R1-7.2 Alarms may also be selected as protective
devices.
R1-7.3 Alarms may be field configurable to allow for
selection of type of audible or visual allowed, or to
allow for selection of either audible or visual and
elimination of the other type.
R1-8 Signs and Visual Alerts
R1-8.1 Signs such as “Caution”, “Warning”, or other
sign appropriate to the potential hazard may be selected
as a method of protection.
R1-8.2 Signs should be compatible with SEMI S1, or
should be approved by the local jurisdictional authority.
R1-8.3 Visual Alerts an indicator applied to floors
or vertical surfaces surrounding a potential are of
delivery, which indicates to persons present that a
potential hazard exists in the area.
R1-8.4 Visual alerts may include:
Striped tape on the floor
Warning barriers
Railings
NOTE R1-3: This should not be considered a complete list
there could be many other solutions.
R1-9 Communication Protocol
R1-9.1 Communication Protocol A method of
communicating the status of the equipment to a
centrally monitored location. This may be direct or
through the equipment communication path.
R1-9.2 Protective devices offered should be capable of
communicating with floor-traveling and space-traveling
UTVs through some type of interface.
R1-10 Providing Information
R1-10.1 If protective devices are offered, the UTV
supplier should provide documentation to the end user
customer about protective devices available.
R1-10.2 Information should be provided to the user to
explain the function of any protective devices that may
be offered.
R1-10.3 Information may also be needed by suppliers
of other equipment to insure adequate communication
between equipment types.
NOTICE: SEMI makes no warranties or
representations as to the suitability of the guideline set
forth herein for any particular application. The
determination of the suitability of the guideline is solely
the responsibility of the user. Users are cautioned to
refer to manufacturer’s instructions, product labels,
product data sheets, and other relevant literature
respecting any materials mentioned herein. This
guideline is subject to change without notice.
The user’s attention is called to the possibility that
compliance with this guideline may require use of
copyrighted material or of an invention covered by
patent rights. By publication of this guideline, SEMI
takes no position respecting the validity of any patent
rights or copyrights asserted in connection with any
item mentioned in this guideline. Users of this guideline
are expressly advised that determination of any such
patent rights or copyrights, and the risk of infringement
of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
Copyright by SEMI® (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials
International), 3081 Zanker Road, San Jose, CA 95134. Reproduction o
f
the contents in whole or in part is forbidden without express written
consent of SEMI.
SEMI S18-1102 © SEMI 2002
1
SEMI S18-1102
ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY GUIDELINE FOR SILANE
FAMILY GASES HANDLING
This guideline was technically approved by the Global Environmental, Health, and Safety Committee and is
the direct responsibility of the Japan Environmental, Health, and Safety Committee. Current edition approved
by the Japan Regional Standards Committee on July 19, 2002. Initially available at www.semi.org
September 2002; to be published November 2002.
NOTICE: Paragraphs entitled “NOTE” are not an
official part of this document and are not intended to
modify or supersede the official guideline. The task
force has supplied them to clarify and to enhance usage
of the guideline by equipment designers.
1 Purpose
1.1 This guideline is intended as a minimum set of
safety and health criteria for silane family gases
handling related to equipment and facilities used in
semiconductor or Flat Panel Display (FPD)
manufacturing.
2 Scope
2.1 Silane family gases which are described in this
guideline are: monosilane (SiH
4
), disilane (Si
2
H
6
),
trisilane (Si
3
H
8
), dichlorosilane (SiH
2
Cl
2
) and
trichlorosilane (SiHCl
3
).
2.2 This guideline includes the following sections:
Purpose
Scope
Limitations
Referenced Standards
Terminology
General Principles
Education and Training
Leak Detection and Alarm Systems
Fire Detection, Suppression and Alarm Systems
Emergency Response
Materials, Components, and Construction for
Silane Family Gas Handling Equipment and
Facilities.
Pressurization and Leak Testing
Storage
Supply Systems
Distribution Systems for Gas Supply
Equipment Using Silane Family Gases
Exhaust Systems and Plumbing
Exhaust Treatment Systems
Related Documents
2.3 This safety guideline does not purport to address all
of the safety issues associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the users of this guideline to establish
appropriate safety and health practices and determine
the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
3 Limitations
3.1 This document is not intended to impart
requirements on any party.
3.2 This document is not intended to apply to gas
manufacturers or distribution companies.
4 Referenced Standards
NOTE 1: As listed or revised, all documents cited shall be
the latest publications of adopted standards.
4.1 SEMI Standards
SEMI F1 — Specification for Leak Integrity of High
Purity Gas Piping Systems and Components
SEMI F3 — Guide for Welding Stainless Steel Tubing
for Semiconductor Manufacturing Applications
SEMI F4 — Specification for Pneumatically Actuated
Cylinder Valves
SEMI F5 — Guide for Gaseous Effluent Handling
SEMI F6 — Guide for Secondary Containment of
Hazardous Gas Piping Systems
SEMI F13 — Guide for Gas Source Control Equipment
SEMI F14 — Guide for the Design of Gas Source
Equipment Enclosures
SEMI F15 — Test Method for Enclosures Using Sulfur
Hexafluoride Tracer Gas and Gas Chromatography
SEMI S1 — Safety Guideline for Equipment Safety
Labels