semi合集-English.pdf - 第6810页
SEMI S2-0703a E © SEMI 1991, 2004 39 method is to make two traverses across t he diameter of the duct at right angles to each other. Reading a re taken at the center of annular rings of equal area. Whenever possible, the…

SEMI S2-0703a
E
© SEMI 1991, 2004 38
manifold boxes, and secondary gas panel enclosures,
are typically six-sided fully enclosed enclosures with
access panels/doors on at least one side. These
ventilated enclosures are designed to contain and
remove hazardous gases from the work area in the
event of a gas piping failure or leak. Gas panel
enclosures are typically of two types, those requiring no
access while gas systems are charged, and those that
must be opened during processing while gas systems
are charged. There is also a distinct difference in
control specifications for those with pyrophorics or
other flammables vs. other HPMs, specifically in the
control of pocketing.
A2-6.1 Design Recommendations
A2-6.1.1 Compartmentalize potential leak points.
A2-6.1.2 Minimize the total size of the panel and its
enclosure.
A2-6.1.3 Minimize size and number of openings.
A2-6.1.4 Minimize static pressure requirements of the
enclosure; control has been shown to be achievable
with –1.3 to –2.5 mm ( –0.05 to –0.1 in.) w.g.
A2-6.1.5 Design for sweep. Minimize the number and
size of openings. Seal unnecessary openings (e.g.,
seams, utility holes).
A2-6.1.6 Where routinely used access doors are
required:
Make the access door as small as practical.
Place the openings to the enclosure in the access
door to minimize air flow requirements.
Provide baffles behind the door to direct leaks
away from the door and openings.
Compartmentalize the enclosure so that access to
one area does not affect air flow control in other
areas.
A2-6.2 Control Specifications
A2-6.2.1 Exhaust volumes as low as 4–5 air changes
per minute or less can be specified and meet the S2
criteria in Section 23.5 if the design principles listed
above are considered when designing equipment and
enclosures.
A2-6.2.2 Where there is potential for chemical
exposure during access which can be controlled by face
velocity, the enclosure should also provide a minimum
face velocity of 0.36 to 0.76 m/s (70 to 150 fpm) when
open. Face velocity should not be relied upon to control
emissions from a pressurized fitting.
A2-6.2.3 Enclosures for pyrophoric or flammable
gases should be designed to ensure adequately uniform
dilution (i.e., prevent “pocketing”) and to prevent
accumulation of pyrophoric and flammable gases above
their lower explosive limit. Uniform dilution can
generally be verified through exhaust vapor
visualization techniques. Ventilation flow rate should
be adequate to maintain concentrations below 25% of
the lower explosive limit for the gas with the lowest
LEL that is used in the enclosure. This can generally be
verified using engineering calculations to verify
dilution, and vapor visualization to verify mixing.
A2-6.3 Recommended Measurement/Validation
Method
A2-6.3.1 Preferred validation by tracer gas testing per
SEMI F15.
A2-6.3.2 Additional confirmation by visualization
check of air flow, mixing and sweep using smoke or
vapor testing.
A2-6.3.3 Measurement of average face velocity at
inlet(s), opening(s), or routinely used access doors.
Measurements should be taken with a velometer or
anemometer. For larger openings, multiple
measurements are taken in a grid, at least 10 to 40 per
square meter (1–4 per square foot) of open area. Useful
equation: V = 4.043 (VP/d)
0.5
, where V = velocity in
m/s, VP = velocity pressure in mm H
2
O, and d =
density correction factor (unitless).
A2-7 Equipment Exhaust Ventilation
Specifications and Measurements
A2-7.1 Specifications for equipment exhaust should be
provided by the supplier and define:
A2-7.1.1 The control specification or standard for the
hood or enclosure, i.e., face velocity or capture velocity
if applicable.
A2-7.1.2 The airflow in the duct required to maintain
the control volume or flow required. Measurements
should be made using the ACGIH pitot traverse method
described below.
A2-7.1.3 The location where the Pitot traverse
measurement in the duct was made.
A2-7.1.4 Static pressure requirements.
A2-7.1.5 Coefficient of Entry (C
e
) (see definitions and
Section 22.3).
A2-7.1.6 Hood Loss Factor (K or F
h
) (see definitions
and Section 22.3).
A2-8 Duct Traverse Method
A2-8.1 Because the air flow in the cross-section of a
duct is not uniform, it is necessary to obtain an average
by measuring velocity pressure (VP) at points in a
number of equal areas in the cross-section. The usual

SEMI S2-0703a
E
© SEMI 1991, 2004 39
method is to make two traverses across the diameter of
the duct at right angles to each other. Reading are taken
at the center of annular rings of equal area. Whenever
possible, the traverse should be made 7.5 duct
diameters downstream and 3 diameters upstream from
obstructions or directional changes such as an elbow,
hood, branch entry, etc. Where measurements are made
closer to disturbances, the results should be considered
subject to some doubt and checked against a second
location. If agreement within 10% of the two traverses
is obtained, reasonable accuracy can be assumed and
the average of the two readings used. Where the
variation exceeds 10%, a third location should be
selected and the two air flows in the best agreement
averaged and used. The use of a single centerline
reading for obtaining average velocity is a very coarse
approximation and is not recommended. If a traverse
cannot be done, then the centerline duct velocity should
be multiplied by 0.9 for a coarse estimate of actual
average duct velocity. Center line duct velocity should
not be used less than 5 duct diameters from an elbow,
junction, hood opening, or other source of turbulence.
A2-8.2 For ducts 150 mm (6 in.) and smaller, at least 6
traverse points should be used. For round ducts larger
than 150 mm (6 in.) diameter, at least 10 traverse points
should be employed. For very large ducts with wide
variation in velocity, 20 traverse points will increase the
precision of the air flow measurement.
A2-8.3 For square or rectangular ducts, the procedure
is to divide the cross-section into a number of equal
rectangular areas and measure the velocity pressure at
the center of each. The number of readings should not
be less than 16. Enough readings should be made so the
greatest distance between centers is less than 150 mm
(6 in.).
A2-8.4 The following data are required:
A2-8.4.1 The area of the duct at the traverse location.
A2-8.4.2 Velocity pressure at each point in the traverse
and/or average velocity and number of points measured.
A2-8.4.3 Temperature of the air stream at the time and
location of the traverse.
A2-8.4.4 The velocity pressure readings obtained are
converted to velocities, and the velocities (not the
velocity pressures) are averaged. Useful equation: V =
4.043 (VP/d)
0.5
, where V = velocity in m/s, VP =
velocity pressure in mm H
2
O, and d = density
correction factor (unitless). Some monitoring
instruments conduct this averaging internal to the
instrument.
A2-8.5 Flow measurement taken at other than standard
air temperatures should be corrected to standard
conditions (i.e., 21C [70F], 760 mm [29.92 in.] Hg).

SEMI S2-0703a
E
© SEMI 1991, 2004 40
APPENDIX 3
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR EQUIPMENT USING LIQUID CHEMICALS
— Design and Test Method Supplement Intended for Internal and
Third Party Evaluation Use
NOTICE: The material in this appendix is an official part of SEMI S2 and was approved by full letter ballot
procedures on December 15, 1999 by the North American Regional Standards Committee.
A3-1 Introduction
A3-1.1 This appendix provides specific technical
information relating to Section 23. In general, it
provides information on potential hazards,
recommended control methods, and design
considerations.
A3-1.2 This appendix is not intended to limit hazard
evaluation methods or control strategies (e.g., design
principles) employed by manufacturers. Alternative
methods are acceptable if they provide an equivalent
level of hazard control.
A3-1.3 This appendix is intended to be used as a
starting point for reference during equipment design.
An example would be during a formal hazard analysis
in a brainstorming session.
Table A3-1 Liquid Chemicals
Potential Hazard Recommended Control Method Design Considerations
Containment, control, and alarm
notification for spills, leaks or vapors.
Appropriately sized secondary containment (minimum 110%
volume of entire contents)
Equipment exhaust
Leak sensors to initiate auto shutdown.
Controlled access to chemical
containment areas.
Door/access cover interlocks that automatically depressurize the
area of the system being accessed.
Exposure to
operators
Control of access to point-of-
operation hazards.
Physical guarding/presence-sensing devices
Control of chemical delivery
pressure; control of residual
chemicals.
Depressurization upon system failure, interlock activation, or
normal shutdown
Transparent doors/covers allow visual inspection.
Exposure to
maintenance
personnel
Serviceability Built-in system purge and flush capabilities
System components accessible and easy to service.
Chemical resistance/compatibility
Appropriate materials used for equipment construction and
components.
General
equipment and
component
failure
Pressure rating
Pressurized systems designed to withstand 150% of maximum
foreseeable pressure, or provide a suitable relief valve.
Durable bulk chemical containers
Use of approved (e.g., DOT, UN Dangerous Goods) containers
in bulk distribution systems.
Control of pressurized vessels and
piping.
Provide visual pressure indicators with or without alarms.
Pressurized vessels and piping are designed and built to
recognized standards.
Spill control Automatic system pressure check prior to allowing dispense.
Use of normally closed valves on distribution lines.
Chemical
delivery system
leak
Drum change-out controls Over-fill sensors on chemical baths
Monitoring for excess flow.
Keyed and color-coded quick-connects