semi合集-English.pdf - 第563页
SEMI E78-1102 © SEMI 1998, 2002 21 RELATED INFORMATION 2 STATIC CONTROL METHODS NOTE: This related inform ation is not an official part of SEMI E78 and is not intend ed to modify or supercede the official standard. Deter…

SEMI E78-1102 © SEMI 1998, 2002 20
arms to open, dropping fully loaded wafer cassettes to
the floor. Costs were associated with loss of product.
R1-3.3.5 Automated material handling system “car”
became charged while coming in close proximity to
ionizer. Car came into contact with grounded object
during charging; creating data corruption which
resulted in system downtime, impact to factory
throughput, and cost associated with the replacement of
control electronics.
R1-3.3.6 Wafer taping/detaping tool generated charge
during normal operation. Chassis ground of the tool
was inadvertently removed, causing high charge to be
developed within the tool. Electrostatic Discharge
occurred at random time intervals within the tool.
Impact to equipment availability, and long solution
time.
R1-3.3.7 Wafers became charged during spin rinse
process. During transfer to wafer metrology tool
electrostatic discharge occurred, causing data
corruption. This resulted in unexpected tool lockups,
and reduced equipment availability.
R1-3.3.8 Ungrounded wall panels became charged and
generated ESD events. EMI produced from ESD events
coupled into photolithography equipment and created
data corruption. This resulted in impacts to equipment
utilization. Long solution time.
R1-3.3.9 Insulative ceiling panels became charged and
generated ESD events which produced high levels of
radiated and conducted EMI in a test area. EMI coupled
into tester/handler and produced data scramble. This
resulted in reduced equipment availability.
R1-3.3.10 Finished product became charged during
manual handling. Product came into direct contact with
test/handler equipment. This resulted in damaged
circuit cards which needed to be replaced, and
decreased equipment availability.
R1-3.3.11 Wafer transfer cart became charged while
rolling over temporary “insulative” floor. Cart came
into contact with plasma etcher control cabinet.
Resulting ESD event caused product loss and reduced
equipment availability.
R1-3.3.12 Wafer polisher robot arm became charged
during normal operation. Chassis ground wire for robot
left off. ESD event occurred causing data scramble
which resulted in process being aborted.
R1-3.4 Conclusion — Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)
affects semiconductor manufacturing equipment in
many ways. The issues are wide ranging from trivial
lock-ups and aborts of process equipment to factory
throughput and yields impacts. The scope of the ESD
problem is very broad and encompasses every aspect of
semiconductor manufacturing.

SEMI E78-1102 © SEMI 1998, 2002 21
RELATED INFORMATION 2
STATIC CONTROL METHODS
NOTE: This related information is not an official part of SEMI E78 and is not intended to modify or supercede the official
standard. Determination of the suitability of the material is solely the responsibility of the user.
R2-1 Static Charge Control
R2-1.1 It is usually impossible to totally eliminate
static electricity from work areas, but with proper use of
equipment and remedial procedures, most static
problems can be controlled. Many approaches to
controlling static charge have been tried over the years
and it is clear that there exists no single method for
controlling all static charge problems.
R2-2 Grounding Conductors and Static
Dissipative Materials
R2-2.1 An important consideration in selecting a
method is whether the charged material is a conductor
or an insulator. Static dissipative materials are created
by lowering the resistivity of insulating materials
through the addition of metal or carbon particles, or
other chemical additives. Static charge on a conductive
or static dissipative object can be easily controlled if the
object is provided with a path for the charge to flow to
earth ground. While charge is mobile in a conductor (or
in a static dissipative material), in insulators charge is
not mobile, and earth grounding is not an effective
means of eliminating the static charge.
R2-2.2 Equipment manufacturers can use both
conductive and static dissipative materials to reduce the
presence of static charge. If there is a path for the
charge to flow to earth ground, the static charge on
equipment, and materials handled by the equipment,
can be rapidly, and harmlessly, neutralized. Obviously,
the success of earth grounding depends on maintaining
the integrity of the ground path. This is sometimes a
problem when high-speed, moving parts of equipment
must be connected to earth ground.
R2-2.3 Static dissipative materials will need to retain
their dissipative properties over the range of
temperature and humidity conditions they will
encounter, and not change significantly over time. In
cleanrooms they must also meet requirements for
avoiding micro-particle production and outgassing. As
long as the ground connection is maintained, these
“passive” procedures offer reasonable protection to the
equipment and product from sources of static charge.
R2-2.4 Unfortunately, these methods do not provide
complete protection from static-related problems. Even
when earth grounding is an option, it is subject to
human error. In applications where contamination is an
issue, additives and carbon particles used in static-
dissipative materials may become sources of
contamination themselves. When earth grounding or the
use of dissipative materials is either inappropriate or not
cost effective, ionization can be used.
R2-3 Ionization
R2-3.1 More often than not, the product itself uses
insulating materials, making earth grounding
unavailable as an option. While silicon is a
semiconductor, its oxide coating transforms it into an
insulator. Teflon is used in many chemical processes,
and quartz in high temperature processes. Epoxy and
ceramic packages are used for integrated circuits.
Insulators are easily charged, retain their charge for
long periods of time, and are often close to the product.
Dealing with static charge on insulators and isolated
conductors will often require the use of some type of
ionization. Ionizers are the most effective means of
dealing with static charges on insulators and isolated
conductors.
R2-3.2 For purposes of static charge control, ions are
molecules of the gases in air (nitrogen, oxygen, water
vapor, and carbon dioxide) that have lost or gained an
electron. Ions are present in normal outside air but are
removed when air is subjected to filtration and air
conditioning. Ionization systems work by increasing the
conductivity of the air with the ionized gas molecules.
When ionized air comes in contact with a charged
surface, the charged surface attracts ions of the opposite
polarity. As a result, the static electricity that has built
up on products, equipment and surfaces is neutralized.
R2-3.3 The most common methods of producing air
ions are radioisotopes and “corona discharge” resulting
from the electric field created when high voltage is
applied to a sharp point.
R2-3.4 The radioisotope most commonly used to
produce ionization is Polonium
210
, an alpha particle
emitter. The alpha particle collides with the surrounding
gas molecules, dislodging electrons, which results in
pairs of positive and negative ions.
R2-3.5 The corona discharge method produces a very
high electric field that interacts with the electrons in the
surrounding gas. The polarity of the ions depends on
the polarity of the high voltage on the emitter point.
Ions of opposite polarity to the charged surface are
required. Either polarity of static charge may be created
in the equipment or on the product.

SEMI E78-1102 © SEMI 1998, 2002 22
R2-3.6 Ionizers in equipment must deliver ionization
over a wide range of humidity and temperature
conditions. Back-end assembly and test areas often do
not have the level of temperature and humidity control
found in front-end wafer production. Ionizers installed
in the cramped spaces of production equipment will be
close to the product, in areas surrounded by grounded
metal parts. Ionizers should isolate the emitter points
from both the product and adjacent grounded surfaces.
Ionizers should produce sufficient ions to discharge
static on surfaces and products moving at high speeds
despite losses to ground. Most ionizers require
maintenance and periodic verification of their
performance.
R2-4 Problem of Controlling Static Charge in
Manufacturing Equipment
R2-4.1 The interior of high speed production
equipment presents a challenge to most static control
methods. The cost of production space is high and
requires that equipment occupying the space be
compact and operate at as high a speed as practical.
Product is moved through small spaces at high speed by
a variety of robotic and other mechanisms. Triboelectric
charging (charge generation due to friction or contact
and separation of dissimilar materials) and contact with
ground are almost unavoidable. Grounding of
equipment parts that contact the product presents added
difficulties when the equipment parts are moving at
high speeds. Dissipating charge from insulating
surfaces and integrated circuit (IC) packages may be
difficult if the charged surfaces are not accessible.
Using ionizers in these confined spaces presents
challenges.