semi合集-English.pdf - 第7420页

SEMI MF1529-1104 © SEMI 2004 1 SEMI MF1529-1104 TEST METHOD FOR SHEET RESI STANCE UNIFORMITY EVALUATION BY IN-LINE FOUR-POINT PROBE WITH THE DUAL-CONFIGURATION PROCEDURE This test method was technically approved by th e …

SEMI MF1528-1104 © SEMI 2004 5

rights or copyrights, and the risk of infringement of

such rights are entirely their own responsibility.

International), 3081 Zanker Road, San Jose, CA 95134. Reproduction

of the contents in whole or in part is forbidden without express

written consent of SEMI.

SEMI MF1529-1104 © SEMI 2004 1

SEMI MF1529-1104

TEST METHOD FOR SHEET RESISTANCE UNIFORMITY EVALUATION

BY IN-LINE FOUR-POINT PROBE WITH THE DUAL-CONFIGURATION

PROCEDURE

This test method was technically approved by the Global Silicon Wafer Committee and is the direct

responsibility of the North American Silicon Wafer Committee. Current edition approved for publication by

the North American Regional Standards Committee on August 16, 2004. Initially available at

www.semi.org

September 2004; to be published November 2004. Original edition published by ASTM International as

ASTM F 1529-94. Last previous edition SEMI MF1529-02.

1 Purpose

1.1 The sheet resistance of epitaxial, implanted,

diffused or deposited films is an important materials

acceptance and process control parameter. The

uniformity across a wafer of the sheet resistance

resulting from any of these processes is important for

the equivalence of performance of devices or circuits

made from various regions of the wafer.

1.2 This test method uses a four-point probe in a

manner different from that of other ASTM methods for

the measurement of the resistivity or sheet resistance of

semiconductors. In this test method, two different ways

(configurations) of connecting the probe pins to the

electronics that supply current and measure voltage are

used at each measurement location on the specimen.

This use of a four-point probe is often referred to as

“dual-configuration” or as “configuration switched”

measurements.

1.3 There are three benefits that result from the second

measurement configuration at each location: (1) the

probe no longer needs to be in a high symmetry

orientation on the specimen, that is, being perpendicular

or parallel to the radius on a circular wafer or to the

length or width of a rectangular specimen, as long as it

is a modest distance from the edge of the wafer, (2) the

lateral dimension(s) of the specimen, and the exact

location of the probe on the specimen no longer have to

be known—the geometric scaling factor results directly

from the two sets of electrical measurements at each

location, (3) the two sets of measurements self-correct

for the actual separations between the probe pins in a

manner that has been shown to be more effective than

measuring probe impressions made on a piece of

polished material. As a result, high precision

measurements can be made with smaller probe

separations than is possible with single configuration

use of a four-point probe, thus allowing higher spatial

resolution of wafer sheet resistance variations.

1 Perloff, D. S., “Four-Probe Correction Factors for Use in

Measuring Large Diameter Doped Semiconductor Wafers,” J.

Electrochem. Soc. 123, 1745–1750 (1976).

1.4 This test method is intended primarily for assessing

the uniformity of layers formed by diffusion, epitaxy,

ion implant and chemical vapor, or other deposition

processes on a silicon substrate. The deposited film,

which may be single crystal, polycrystalline or

amorphous silicon, or a metal film, must be electrically

isolated from the substrate. This can be accomplished

if the layer is of opposite conductivity type from the

substrate or is deposited over a dielectric layer such as

silicon dioxide. This test method is capable of

measuring films as thin as 0.05 m, but particular care

is required for establishing reliable measurements for

most films in the range below 0.2 m. Films that have

a thickness up to half the probe separation can be

measured without the use of a thickness-related

correction factor. It may give misleading results for

films formed by silicon on insulator technologies

because of charge or charge trapping in the insulator.

1.5 This test method can be used to measure the sheet

resistance uniformity of bulk substrates. However, the

thickness of the substrate must be known to be constant

or must be measured at all positions where sheet

resistance values are measured in order to calculate

relative variations in resistance reliably.

NOTE 1: The thickness correction factor for layers that are

thicker than 0.5 times the probe spacing is known to vary

more rapidly than that for single-configuration four-probe

measurements, but such a correction has not yet been

published. Until such a correction is published, resistivity

values determined by the dual-configuration method will not

be accurate for these thicker specimens; however, if the wafer

has uniform thickness, variations of resistivity can still be

determined by this test method.

1.6 This test method is suitable for use in materials

acceptance, equipment qualification, process control,

research, and development.

2 Scope

2.1 This test method covers the direct measurement of

the sheet resistance and its variation for all but the

periphery (amounting to three probe separations) for

circular conducting layers pertinent to silicon

semiconductor technology. These layers may be

SEMI MF1529-1104 © SEMI 2004 2

fabricated on substrates of any diameter that is capable

of being securely mounted on a prober stage.

NOTE 2: The equation used to calculate the sheet resistance

data from measurements is not perfectly accurate out to the

edge of the wafer for probes oriented at an arbitrary angle

with respect to a wafer radius. Further, automatic instruments

on which this test method will be performed may not have

perfect centering of the wafer on the measurement stage.

These factors require that the periphery of the layer being

measured be excluded. Also, many thin film processes use

wafer clamps that preclude forming layers out to the edge of

the substrate. The edge exclusion in this test method applies

to the film that is being measured, rather than to the substrate.

The equation used is based on mathematics developed for

layers of circular shape. It is expected to work well for layers

of other shapes such as rectangular, if edge exclusion

requirements are met; however, the accuracy near the edge of

other shapes has not been demonstrated.

2.2 This test method can be used to measure sheet

resistance values from below 10 m for metal films, to

over 25 000  for thin silicon films. However, for

films at the upper end of this resistance range, and for

films toward the low end of the thickness range, the

interpretation of the sheet resistance values may not be

straightforward due to various semiconductor

effects.

3,4,5

NOTE 3: The principles of this test method are also

applicable to other semiconductor materials, but the

appropriate conditions and the expected precision have not

been established.

2.3 This test method uses two different electrical

configurations of the four-point probe at each

measurement location. It does not require measurement

of probe location on the wafer, or probe separations, or

of wafer diameter (except to determine edge exclusion

for measurement-site selection) as do other four-point

probe methods such as Test Methods SEMI MF81,

SEMI MF84 and SEMI MF374. By use of electrical

data from the two different configurations at each

location, the method is self-calibrating with respect to

the geometrical parameters.

2.4 This test method is intended to be used on

automated wafer testing systems that use R-theta or X-

2 Perloff, D. S., Gan, J. N., and Wahl, F. E.,“Dose Accuracy and

Doping Uniformity of Ion Implant Equipment,” Solid State

Technology 24 (2), 112–120 (1981).

3 Huang, R. S., and Ladbrooke, P. H., “The Use of a Four-Point

Probe for Profiling SubMicron Layers,” Solid State Electronics 21,

1123–1128 (1978).

4 Eranna, G., and Kakati, D., “Limitations on the Range of

Measurements of Sheet Resistivity of Shallow Diffused Layers for

Profiling by the Four-Point Probe Technique,” Solid State Electronics

25, 611–614 (1982).

5 Kramer, P., and vanRuyven, L. J., “Space Charge Influence on

Resistivity Measurements,” Solid State Electronics 20, 1011–1019

(1977).

Y stage positioning for the measurements. The rapid

calculations for sheet resistance used in this test method

are based on more extensive calculations, and are

within 0.1% of the results of those more extensive

calculations, even if the probes are not oriented parallel

or perpendicular to a wafer radius, providing that the

probes are more than 3-probe spacings from the edge of

the layer being measured

1,2

(see Note 1).

2.5 Use of two electrical configurations at each

measurement site eliminates the need for measurement

of geometric separation of the probe tips in order to

analyze the data. As a result, even for referee

measurements, any probe spacing that is agreed upon

between the parties to the test and demonstrates

sufficiently low data scatter may be used for this test

method.

2.6 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as

the standard. The values given in parentheses are for

information only.

NOTICE: This standard does not purport to address

safety issues, if any, associated with its use. It is the

responsibility of the user of this standard to establish

appropriate safety and health practices and determine

the applicability of regulatory or other limitations prior

to use.

3 Limitations

3.1 Photoconductive and photovoltaic effects can

seriously influence the measured sheet resistance,

particularly with high resistivity layers or those with

very shallow junctions. Therefore, all measurements

should be made in a darkened enclosure unless

experience shows that the material of interest is

insensitive to ambient illumination.

3.2 Spurious currents can be induced in the test circuit

when the equipment is located near high-frequency

generators. If such a location is unavoidable, adequate

shielding must be provided.

3.3 Minority carrier injection during the measurement

can occur due to the electric field in the specimen.

With material possessing a long minority-carrier

lifetime and moderate to high resistivity, such injection

can result in a lowering of the resistivity (sheet

resistance) for a distance of several centimeters from

the point of injection. Carrier injection can be detected

by repeating the measurements at lower current. In the

absence of injection, no increase in resistivity should be

observed at the lower current. The current level

recommended, (see Table 1) should reduce the

probability of difficulty from this interference to a

minimum, but in cases of doubt the measurements

should be repeated at a lower current level. If the

proper current is being used, doubling or halving its