semi合集-English.pdf - 第7488页

SEMI MF1630-0704 © SEMI 2004 8 NOTICE: SEMI makes no warranties or representations as to the su itability of the standards set forth herein for a ny particular application. The determination of the suitab ility of the st…

100%1 / 7923
SEMI MF1630-0704 © SEMI 2004 7
RELATED INFORMATION 1
DERIVATION OF FACTORS USED IN CALCULATING
CONCENTRATIONS AND DENSITIES OF ELEMENTS IN SILICON
NOTICE: This related information is not an official part of SEMI MF1630. It was developed as non-mandatory
information in ASTM during the initial development of the document in 1994-5. This related information was
approved for publication by SEMI by full letter ballot procedures on March 14, 2004.
R1-1 The factors shown in Table 1 resulted from
several years of corrections and modifications but are
ultimately based on resistivity measurements on silicon
samples. The dopant density, or the concentration of
impurities for this test method, is directly obtained
from the conversion Tables found in SEMI MF723.
R1-2 Baber’s
5
calibration factors published in 1980,
were the starting point for the current factors.
Corrections or modifications, or both, to his published
data follow in this discussion.
R1-2.1 Baber’s LTFT-IR study utilized the conversion
relations reported by Irvin
7
in 1962, relating resistivity
and impurity concentrations. Currently, the conversion
tables given in SEMI MF723 are believed to be more
reliable. Corrections to Baber’s factors were made to
reflect these new conversion tables.
R1-2.2 The factors of Baber relate peak heights of the
absorption bands to concentrations. Peak heights are
extremely sensitive to several FT-IR parameters. The
phosphorus band at 316.0 cm
1
and the arsenic band at
382.0 cm
1
are very narrow, about 0.25 cm
1
, and thus
the peak heights of these bands vary greatly with
nominal resolution, type of apodization, degree of zero-
filling, and mechanical strain on the sample. The boron
absorption at 319.6 cm
1
band used in this test method
is actually a composite of four separate boron
absorption bands. The variability of the measurement
of the absorption bands is reduced considerably when
peak areas are used instead of peak heights. The use of
peak areas is common in the field and their use is
specified in this test method.
R1-2.3 Further minor modifications have been made
over the in the period from about 1985 to about 1995 in
several laboratories that use LTFT-IR spectrometers for
determination of electrically active impurities.
R1-2.3.1 Studies with and without the white light on
the silicon samples, covering a wide range of
concentrations, are valuable as tools to check for
consistency of the boron and phosphorus factors, which
are indeed the most common impurities. With the
absence of white light, the LTFT-IR method shows
7 Irvin, J. C., “Resistivity of Bulk Silicon Diffused Layers in
Silicon,” Bell System Tech. J. 41, 387–410 (1962).
only the net carrier absorption bands at an intensity
proportional to the excess majority carrier
concentration. These data along with the total
impurities obtained with white light on the samples
permitted minor adjustments to the boron or
phosphorus factors, or both.
R1-2.3.2 Silicon samples whose resistivity has been
carefully determined have been measured by LTFT-IR
spectroscopy, and the results used to confirm or slightly
modify the calibration factors.
R1-3 In 1990, a pilot study was conducted in which ten
silicon samples were examined at four different
laboratories by either LTFT-IR or photoluminescence,
or both, and the results compared. Even though each
laboratory used their own factors and modifications of
this test method for determination of impurity
concentrations, the data for boron and phosphorus all
agreed to within ± 20% of the average value. The
factors given in this test method are approximately
equal to the average values from that study.
R1-4 In summary, the factors given in Table 1 are a
result of continued refinement as more and better
measurements have been made. However, they
ultimately correspond to the resistivity measurements
and the conversion to dopant (impurity) concentrations
as given in SEMI MF723. The factors for boron and
phosphorus have the highest degree of certainty since
these two elements are the most commonly measured
and are therefore studied the most. The factors for the
other elements, especially aluminum, antimony,
gallium, and indium, should be considered only
approximations and used only to estimate their
concentrations in silicon.
SEMI MF1630-0704 © SEMI 2004 8
NOTICE: SEMI makes no warranties or
representations as to the suitability of the standards
set forth herein for any particular application. The
determination of the suitability of the standard is
solely the responsibility of the user. Users are
cautioned to refer to manufacturer' s instructions,
product labels, product data sheets, and other
relevant literature, respecting any materials or
equipment mentioned herein. These standards are
subject to change without notice.
By publication of this standard, Semiconductor
Equipment and Materials International (SEMI)
takes no position respecting the validity of any
patent rights or copyrights asserted in connection
with any items mentioned in this standard. Users
of this standard are expressly advised that
determination of any such patent rights or
copyrights, and the risk of infringement of such
rights are entirely their own responsibility.
Copyright by SEMI® (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials
International), 3081 Zanker Road, San Jose, CA 95134. Reproduction o
f
the contents in whole or in part is forbidden without express written
consent of SEMI.
SEMI MF1708-1104 © SEMI 2004 1
SEMI MF1708-1104
PRACTICE FOR EVALUATION OF GRANULAR POLYSILICON BY
MELTER-ZONER SPECTROSCOPIES
This guide was technically approved by the Global Silicon Wafer Committee and is the direct responsibility
of the North American Silicon Wafer Committee. Current edition approved for publication by the North
American Regional Standards Committee on August 16, 2004. Initially available at
www.semi.org
September 2004; to be published November 2004. Original edition published by ASTM International as
ASTM F 1708-96. Last previous edition SEMI MF1708-02
1 Purpose
1.1 Polycrystalline silicon is used as the starting
material for growth of large single crystal ingots by
Czochralski methods.
1.2 Although Czochralski grown ingots are intention-
ally doped during crystal growth to the desired
resistivity and type, the dopant levels in the polysilicon
must be known to calculate the amount of dopant to be
added. This practice provides a means to determine the
impurity levels in granular polysilicon to be used for
crystal growth.
1.3 Carbon levels in polysilicon must be known so that
the concentration of carbon in the ingot can be
controlled to a low level.
1.4 This practice has applicability in production control,
quality assurance, materials research, and materials
acceptance.
2 Scope
2.1 This practice describes a procedure to consolidate
granular polysilicon into a solid rod and then to convert
the polysilicon rod into a single crystal by a float-zone
technique. The resultant single crystal ingot is used for
the determination of trace impurities in the polysilicon.
These impurities are acceptor and donor components
(usually boron, aluminum, phosphorus, arsenic, and
antimony) as well as substitutional carbon.
2.2 The useful range of impurity concentration covered
by this practice is 0.002 to 100 parts per billion atomic
(ppba) for acceptor and donor impurities, and 0.02 to 15
parts per million atomic (ppma) for carbon. The
acceptor and donor impurities in a slice taken from the
single crystal ingot are analyzed by photoluminescence
or infrared spectroscopies. The carbon impurity is
determined by analysis of a slice by infrared
spectroscopy.
2.3 This practice is applicable only to evaluation of
polysilicon granules as produced by thermal
decomposition and deposition of silane, or one of the
chlorosilanes, onto high purity seeds of polysilicon in a
continuous or batch fluid bed reactor. The granules are
near spherical in shape and range in size from 200 to
3000 m with a mean size of about 900–1200 m.
NOTICE: This standard does not purport to address
safety issues, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish
appropriate safety and health guides and determine the
applicability of regulatory or other limitations prior to
use.
3 Limitations
3.1 The quartz tubes used in this procedure must be of
high purity, especially in regards to the impurities to be
measured. Boron is of particular concern since it is
always present in quartz and may frequently appear in
uncharacteristically high concentrations in polysilicon.
3.2 All chemicals and gases used in this procedure must
be free of components to be measured or they may give
extraneously high results.
3.3 Loss of single crystal during the zone pass will
produce an ingot that may give unsatisfactory results.
The quality of the infrared or photoluminescence
spectra usually reveals the lack of single crystal.
4 Referenced Standards
4.1 SEMI Standards
SEMI C3.42 — Specification for Argon
SEMI C28 — Specifications and Guidelines for
Hydrofluoric Acid
SEMI C31 — Specification for Methanol
SEMI C34 — Specification and Guideline for Mixed
Acid Etchants
SEMI C35 — Specifications and Guideline for Nitric
Acid
SEMI MF1241 — Terminology of Silicon Technology
SEMI MF1389 — Test Methods for Photoluminescence
Analysis of Single Crystal Silicon for III-V Impurities
SEMI MF1391 — Test Method for Substitutional
Carbon Content of Silicon by Infrared Absorption