semi合集-English.pdf - 第7066页

SEMI S18-1102 © SEMI 2002 4 moisture, corrosivity can radically increase and pyrophoric by product gases might also be produced. NOTE 2: The most recent and best research on DCS puts the AIT (Auto Ignition Temperature) a…

100%1 / 7923
SEMI S18-1102 © SEMI 2002
3
American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists.) [SEMI F6].
5.2.8 TWA — Time Weighted Average As defined
by the American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH
®
) [SEMI F6].
5.2.9 VMB — Valve Manifold Box.
5.3 Definitions
5.3.1 abatement system — a system used to modify the
effluent from a process in order to make it safe to emit
from the facility or to reduce emissions of hazardous
materials to safe levels.
5.3.2 authorized personnel those persons trained
and capable of performing activities involving the risks
associated with the defined tasks.
5.3.3 carriage a hand cart for carrying one or two
gas cylinders.
5.3.4 chlorosilane dichlorosilane or trichlorosilane.
5.3.5 controlled condition when related to silane
family gases, a condition in which the gas is controlled
within the confines of an approved piping system with
controls that can determine if the safe parameters of the
piping system have failed.
5.3.6 exhaust treatment system a system similar to
an abatement system, except it handles only the
airborne emissions from a process in order to make
them safe to emit or to reduce the levels of hazardous
materials to safe emission levels.
5.3.7 fail-safe designed so that a failure does not
result in an increased risk [SEMI S2].
5.3.8 flammable gas any gas that forms an ignitable
mixture in air at 20 degrees C (68°F) and 101.3 kPa
(14.7 psia) [SEMI S2].
5.3.9 Flow Limiting Device a device installed in a
valve that is designed to reduce the maximum flow
from the valve under full flow conditions [SEMI F5]
[One such device is a Restricted Flow Orifice (RFO)].
5.3.10 foolproof designed so that any single human
error or misuse does not result in unacceptable risk.
5.3.11 occupational exposure limits (OELs) Various
terms are used to refer to OELs, such as permissible
exposure levels, Threshold Limit Values
®
, maximum
acceptable concentrations, maximum exposure limits,
and occupational exposure standards. When OELs are
used to specify work-area criteria in this document ,
OELs are generally established on the basis of an eight
hour workday. When OELs are used to specify criteria
in this document for alarm or warning in non-
occupational area, OELs established on shorter
exposure basis may be used. However, the criteria
used in determining OELs can differ among the various
countries that have established values. Refer to the
national bodies responsible for the establishment of
OELs. (Threshold Limit Value is a registered trademark
of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists.)
5.3.12 oxidizer gas a gas which will support
combustion or increase the burning rate of a
combustible material with which it may come in contact
[SEMI S4].
5.3.13 pyrophoric gas “a gas which upon contact
with air will ignite spontaneously at or below a
temperature of 54°C (130°F) [SEMI S4]” at a pressure
of 101.3kPa (14.7psia).
5.3.14 safe shutdown condition a condition in which
all hazardous energy sources are removed or suitably
contained and hazardous production materials are
removed or contained, unless this results in additional
hazardous conditions.
5.3.15 safe state a condition in which the equipment
does not present any uncontrolled hazards to itself or to
personnel. It does not allow hazardous production
chemicals to flow.
An acceptable safe state is
determined by the designer of the equipment and is
based on the hazards in the design.
5.3.16 silane any of monosilane, disilane, or
trisilane.
5.3.17 unacceptable risks — risks of a degree or type
which are not acceptable to the person who approves a
design or procedure.
5.3.18 unsafe gas condition a condition in which the
gas is not safely contained within the designed
parameters of the equipment process, or which could
lead to a gas emission or gas hazard.
6 General Principles
6.1 Since silane family gases have several hazardous
properties, personnel should wear appropriate
protective equipment when working with silane family
gas sources.
6.1.1 Monosilane (SiH
4
), disilane (Si
2
H
6
) and trisilane
(Si
3
H
8
) are pyrophoric. If these gases are mixed with
stronger oxidizing gases than air, combustion and
explosion energies can radically increase.
6.1.2 Dichlorosilane (SiH
2
Cl
2
) is pyrophoric and
trichlorosilane (SiHCl
3
) is flammable. Dichlorosilane
(SiH
2
Cl
2
) and trichlorosilane (SiHCl
3
) are also
corrosive gases. If these gases are mixed with
SEMI S18-1102 © SEMI 2002
4
moisture, corrosivity can radically increase and
pyrophoric byproduct gases might also be produced.
NOTE 2: The most recent and best research on DCS puts the
AIT (Auto Ignition Temperature) at 44 degrees C plus/minus
3 degrees C, or about 111 degrees F. It should be noted
however, that unlike silane, DCS is not expected to autoignite
in almost all ambient conditions where we would find it in
use. For fire protection purposes it can be treated as a highly
flammable gas.
6.2 Risk Management Strategies Fundamental
concepts of safety and accident prevention are:
6.2.1 An understanding of facilities, piping and
equipment, from storage to gas abatement, is essential
for safe handling of silane family gases in
semiconductor or FPD manufacturing facilities.
6.2.2 The safety of facilities can be enhanced by
implementation of designs for sources, piping and
equipment that use devices with fail-safe, foolproof,
self-diagnostic and predictive functions.
6.2.3 Safety systems should detect current safety status
and generate notices that indicate conditions of elevated
risk, through computer self-diagnosis and dedicated
SSCS devices. If the SSCSs cannot confirm normal
operation of assigned silane family gas handling system
or unit, the silane family gas supply should
automatically be shut off.
6.2.3.1 SSCSs can determine if a safe status has been
achieved before proceeding to the next step in a silane
family gas handling process.
6.2.3.2 SSCSs should be provided in distribution
facilities, cylinder cabinets, process equipment, gas
treatment systems, and the like.
6.2.4 Safe design depends on equipment designers’ and
facilities designers’ understanding of silane family gas
properties and hazards. Design methods for controlling
these hazards require full integration of measures from
all portions of the delivery and use systems.
NOTE 3: Information on silane family gases’ hazards is
available from various sources, including: regulations,
MSDSs, Factory Mutual Loss Prevention Data Sheets, NFPA
Standards, consensus Building Codes, and various research
papers.
6.2.4.1 The supplier should complete, prior to use, a
hazard identification and risk assessment [such as
Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), Hazard and
Operability Analysis (Haz-Op), Failure Mode Effects
Analysis (FMEA)], for all silane family gas systems.
6.2.4.2 The results of the analysis should be reported
using the SEMI S10 risk matrix.
6.2.5 Minimization of Quantity The quantity of any
silane family gas online and in use should be limited to
the smallest amount necessary for effective production.
NOTE 4: Separation and setback considerations for silane
family gas storage and dispensing areas must be in
accordance with jurisdictional requirements.
6.2.6 Periodic accident prevention assessments should
be performed to assist in minimizing incident
frequency.
6.3 Isolation (Lockout/Tagout) Isolation (“lock
out/tag out”) capability should be provided for all silane
sources at all levels necessary to perform service or
maintenance safely on silane family gas systems.
6.3.1 Energy isolation of all other energy sources (e.g.,
electrical, mechanical) should be performed, as
appropriate, to provide safety for personnel working on
energy systems associated with silane family gases.
NOTE 5: Maintenance on energized non-hazardous electrical
systems may not be safe when a silane family gas is present in
the system.
6.4 Access Control
6.4.1 Multiple level access control, to each point where
any hazard may exist in a normal or failure state, should
be provided for all silane family gas systems.
6.5 All personnel concerned in silane family gas
handling should be trained for the jobs they are to
perform and hazards to which they will be exposed. All
such training should be formally documented and if
regulations apply then the documentation should be in
accordance with the regulations.
6.5.1 Audits of system status and equipment condition
should be performed and documented on a periodic
basis.
6.5.2 The operator or technician should be capable of
checking the current status and any abnormal condition
before beginning work on any system or sub-system.
6.5.3 Evacuation and Purging
6.5.3.1 When connecting silane family gas piping to
equipment, the air in the piping should be purged out
with inert gas such as nitrogen into a safe location to
prevent reaction with silane family gases.
6.5.3.2 To enable purging without venting into unsafe
locations, a purge port should be installed at locations
where sealed systems require purging. Purge ports
should have a stop valve and, if not connected to the
purge gas, should be sealed with a cap or plug.
SEMI S18-1102 © SEMI 2002
5
6.5.3.3 The user should introduce silane family gases
only after purging oxidizing gases and other
incompatible gases, materials or substances from the
system.
6.5.3.4 Silane family gas systems should have
procedures based on calculated minimum purge cycles,
minimum purge-gas pressures, and necessary vacuum
levels to insure the system has been adequately purged
before being opened to atmosphere. Calculations are
needed to define minimum number of cycles. Process
purges typically far exceed this number of cycles,
therefore testing is usually not necessary.
6.5.3.5 An adequate means should be provided to avoid
a cross contamination of purge gases and the process
gases by accidental backflow.
6.5.3.6 Separation of purge gas and silane family gases
should not solely depend on check valves. A control
valve, such as a pneumatic valve placed before or after
the check valve, is preferred for isolating silane family
gases from other gases during procedures that might
allow reverse flow.
6.5.4 The purge gas for silane family gases should be
supplied from dedicated source containers.
NOTE 6: Some regional codes (e.g., Japan’s High Pressure
Gas Safety Law) require a purge gas source which is totally
separated from the purge gas source for oxidizer gas lines.
6.5.4.1 Purge lines from dedicated bulk supplies
(where allowed at all by the jurisdiction) should have
multi-level back-flow and pressure differential
protection to prevent potential back-flow of pyrophoric
gases into bulk systems.
NOTE 7: Back-flow into these bulk purge systems has been
known to generate ignitable mixtures when the inert gas is
exposed to atmosphere far from the source of contamination.
7 Education and Training
NOTE 8: It is important for managers as well as employees
to deepen their understanding of the characteristics of gases
that they handle, so as to ensure safe work practices. If
employees do not handle gases, this section is not applied.
7.1 Everyone who handles silane family gases should
be specially educated about the hazardous properties
and safe handling methods of these gases.
NOTE 9: Some jurisdictions (such as Japan) require that
users of “specialty high-pressure gases” provide special safety
education to their employees.
7.1.1 In regard to safety education and training, each
organization should create the curricula or obtain
approved curricula for education and training, assign a
person responsible for education and training, and
implement a periodic training plan.
7.1.2 Instructors should be persons who have sufficient
knowledge and experience about the hazards, use and
safe control of silane family gases.
NOTE 10: It may be necessary to request the assistance of
outside experts, depending on an organization’s capabilities.
7.1.3 Training should include safe use, handling,
hazardous properties and by-products and emergency
procedures of process gases as well as case studies of
past accidents.
7.1.4 Training should be performed periodically and
the training results documented.
7.2 Equipment and facilities suppliers, maintenance
service providers and users should establish education
curricula for job specific environmental, safety, and
health (ES&H) education programs, train their
personnel, and keep records or issue certificates.
7.3 Maintenance personnel should be fully trained in
their own areas of responsibility.
7.3.1 Maintenance personnel should understand the
overall design of facilities and equipment for silane
family gases.
7.3.2 Energy isolation (“lock out/tag out”) training
should be provided to all employees who are expected
to perform service or maintenance on silane family gas
systems.
7.4 Training curricula, should be requested from the
responsible party (constructor, facility manager, or
equipment manufacturer) as part of the purchase
specifications.
7.4.1 Each party should have qualified persons to train
personnel working in their facility.
NOTE 11: It may be necessary to request the assistance of
outside experts to perform training, depending on an
organization’s capabilities.
NOTE 12: Responsible persons for each party must be
trained as required by regulation.
7.5 Training of persons performing periodic
inspections should be provided to ensure the
inspections are performed and documented properly.
NOTE 13: Ideally, information on safe design practices and
accident investigation summaries should be freely shared
across the industry, so the information can be provided, as
part of education and training, to all personnel who could
potentially be exposed.