semi合集-English.pdf - 第7520页
SEMI MF1727-0304 © SEMI 2003, 2004 1 SEMI MF1727-0304 PRACTICE FOR DETECTION OF OX IDATION INDUCED DEFECTS IN POLISHED SILICON WAFERS This practice was technically approved by the Global Silicon Wafer Committee and is th…

SEMI MF1726-1103 © SEMI 2003 3
a b
NOTE: The orientation of the wafer does not define the
locations and direction of the line defects.
Figure 2
Typical Scratches (a) or Mechanically Induced
Defects (b) as Seen With High-Intensity Light
Inspection
8.4.2 Obtain a second sample if evidence of
mechanically or operator induced damage or
contamination is observed, because these artifacts
interfere with the identification of crystal growth
defects.
NOTE 5: Slip defects may be differentiated from the crystal
growth defects by insuring that all of the defects are aligned
as shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the characteristics of
scratches or mechanical damage when viewed under high
intensity light conditions.
8.4.3 Microscopic Defect Counting — Count and report
the density of observed defects using SEMI MF1810.
9 Keywords
9.1 dislocation; epitaxy; grain boundaries; hillock;
polycrystalline imperfections; preferential etch; shallow
pit; silicon; slip; stacking fault
NOTICE: SEMI makes no warranties or
representations as to the suitability of the standards set
forth herein for any particular application. The
determination of the suitability of the standard is solely
the responsibility of the user. Users are cautioned to
refer to manufacturer' s instructions, product labels,
product data sheets, and other relevant literature,
respecting any materials or equipment mentioned
herein. These standards are subject to change without
notice.
By publication of this standard, Semiconductor
Equipment and Materials International (SEMI) takes no
position respecting the validity of any patent rights or
copyrights asserted in connection with any items
mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are
expressly advised that determination of any such patent
rights or copyrights and the risk of infringement of such
rights are entirely their own responsibility.
Copyright by SEMI® (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials
International), 3081 Zanker Road, San Jose, CA 95134. Reproduction o
f
the contents in whole or in part is forbidden without express written
consent of SEMI.

SEMI MF1727-0304 © SEMI 2003, 2004 1
SEMI MF1727-0304
PRACTICE FOR DETECTION OF OXIDATION INDUCED DEFECTS IN
POLISHED SILICON WAFERS
This practice was technically approved by the Global Silicon Wafer Committee and is the direct
responsibility of the North American Silicon Wafer Committee. Current edition approved for publication by
the North American Regional Standards Committee on December 4, 2003. Initially available at
www.semi.org February 2004; to be published March 2004. Originally published by ASTM International as
ASTM F 1727-97. Last previous edition SEMI MF1727-02.
1 Purpose
1.1 Defects induced by thermal processing of silicon
wafers may adversely influence device performance
and yield.
1.2 These defects are influenced directly by
contamination, ambient atmosphere, temperature, time
at temperature, and rate of change of temperature to
which the specimens are subjected. Conditions vary
significantly among device manufacturing technologies.
The thermal cycling procedures of this practice are
intended to simulate basic device processing
technologies. Oxidation cycles other than specified
herein, or multiple oxidation cycles, may sometimes
more accurately simulate device-processing procedures.
The results obtained may differ significantly from those
obtained with the specified oxidation cycles.
1.3 The geometry of some patterns revealed by this
practice suggests that they are related to the crystal
growth process while others seem related to surface
preparation or thermal cycling conditions.
1.4 This practice is suitable for acceptance testing
when used with referenced practices and methods.
2 Scope
2.1 This practice covers the detection of crystalline
defects in the surface region of silicon wafers. The
defects are induced or enhanced by oxidation cycles
encountered in normal device processing. An
atmospheric pressure oxidation cycle representative of
bipolar, metal-oxide-silicon (MOS) and CMOS
technologies is included. This practice reveals strain
fields arising from the presence of precipitates,
oxidation induced stacking faults, and shallow etch pits.
Slip is also revealed that arises when internal or edge
stresses are applied to the wafer.
2.2 Application of this practice is limited to specimens
that have been chemical or chemical/mechanical
polished to remove surface damage from at least one
side of the specimen. This practice may also be applied
to detection of defects in epitaxial layers.
2.3 The surface of the specimen opposite the surface to
be investigated may be damaged deliberately or
otherwise treated for gettering purposes or chemically
etched to remove damage.
NOTICE: This standard does not purport to address
safety issues, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish
appropriate safety and health practices and determine
the applicability of regulatory or other limitations prior
to use.
3 Limitations
3.1 Material having residual work damage in the
polished surface exhibits visible patterns when the
procedures of this practice are used. Usually, edge
damage, lapping damage, tool marks, or scratches are
easily identified by the location and pattern observed.
3.2 Contamination not removed by preparatory
cleaning procedures or deposited following cleaning,
may become visible after oxidation and preferential
etching.
3.3 Slip may be introduced by differential expansion at
the points of wafer support in the furnace boat. Slip
radiating from the points of support may be assumed to
originate from this boat pinch and not be inherent in the
unprocessed wafer. Slip may also be caused by large
thermal gradients imposed across a wafer by fast
insertion or removal from the furnace.
3.4 If the oxidation furnace or apparatus is
contaminated, it can cause extraneous artifacts or
defects.
3.5 Striations, helical features on the surface of a
silicon wafer, are ascribed to periodic dopant
incorporation differences occurring at the rotating solid-
liquid interface during crystal growth. These features
are visible to the unaided eye after preferential etching,
seem continuous under 100× magnification, and may be
confused with ring patterns of oxidation stacking faults.
3.6 Otherwise identical wafers with different back
surface conditions may yield different results by this
practice.

SEMI MF1727-0304 © SEMI 2003, 2004 2
3.7 Wafers, particularly <111> orientation, may show
lower shallow-pit defect density when the back surface
of the wafer is gettered. Backside gettering should be
noted in the sample classification when data are
reported.
4 Referenced Standards
4.1 SEMI Standards
SEMI C3.19 — Standard for Hydrogen (H
2
) 99.9995%
Quality
SEMI C28 — Specifications and Guidelines for
Hydrofluoric Acid
SEMI C54 — Specifications and Guidelines for
Oxygen
SEMI MF1241 — Terminology of Silicon Technology
SEMI MF1809 — Guide for Selection and Use of
Etching Solutions to Delineate Structural Defects in
Silicon
SEMI MF1810 — Test Method for Counting
Preferentially Etched or Decorated Surface Defects in
Silicon Wafers
4.2 ASTM Standard
1
D 5127 — Guide for Ultra Pure Water Used in the
Electronics and Semiconductor Industry
NOTICE: Unless otherwise indicated, all documents
cited shall be the latest published versions.
5 Terminology
5.1 Defect-related terminology may be found in SEMI
MF1241.
6 Summary of Practice
6.1 Wet oxidation is used to generate or highlight
defects, or both, in silicon wafers. This oxidation may
also simulate simple device production processes.
6.2 The defects are revealed subsequently by
preferential etching and examination by interference
contrast microscopy according to referenced SEMI
standards.
7 Apparatus
7.1 Oxidation Furnace — furnace shall be consistent
with the intended process application and shall sustain a
designated temperature with uniformity less than ± 5° C
over a zone at least 0.3-m long.
1 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 11.01. ASTM International,
100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428. Telephone:
610-832-9500. Fax: 610-832-9555. Website:
www.astm.org
.
7.2 Steam Source — Wet oxidation shall be carried out
using a pyrogenic steam generator to provide steam.
7.3 Working Chamber — A pure, fused quartz, silicon
carbide, or silicon tube of an inside diameter sufficient
to hold the specimen wafers. The inlet end shall be
fitted with the appropriate pyrogenic torch apparatus.
The exhaust end shall be fitted to exhaust the process
gases to satisfy applicable environmental requirements
and prevent back streaming of outside air into the
working chamber.
7.4 Wafer Boat — A quartz, silicon or silicon carbide
fixture for holding the specimen wafers either parallel
or perpendicular to the gas flow in the furnace.
7.5 Pickup Tool — A manual or automated transfer
tool fitted with a nonmetallic material such as quartz or
TFE-fluorocarbon. The pickup tool shall be
constructed so that no metal can contact the specimen
wafer.
8 Reagents and Materials
8.1 Purity of Reagents — Chemicals shall conform to
the assay and impurity levels of Grade 1 SEMI
Specifications where they exist. Reagents for which
SEMI specifications have not been developed shall
conform to the specifications of the Committee on
Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical
Society,
2
where such specifications are available.
Gases shall conform to the purity requirements of the
cited SEMI specifications. Other grades may be used
provided it is first ascertained that the reagent is of
sufficiently high purity to permit its use without
lessening the accuracy of the determination.
8.2 Purity of Water — Reference to water shall be
understood to mean Type E-3 or better water as
described in ASTM Guide D 5127.
8.3 Hydrofluoric Acid — Concentrated, in accordance
with Grade 1 of SEMI C28.
8.4 Hydrogen Gas — In accordance with SEMI C3.19,
for use in pyrogenic steam generator.
8.5 Oxygen Gas — In accordance with SEMI C54, for
use both as furnace ambient and in pyrogenic steam
generator.
2 Reagent Chemicals, American Chemical Society Specifications,
American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. For suggestions on the
testing of reagents not listed by the American Chemical Society, see
Analar Standards for Laboratory Chemicals, BDH Ltd., Poole,
Dorset, U.K., and the United States Pharmacopeia and National
Formulary, U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., (USPC), Rockville,
MD.